Suillellus luridus (formerly Boletus luridus), commonly known as the lurid bolete, is a fungus of the family Boletaceae, found in calcareous broadleaved woodlands in Europe. Fruit bodies appear in summer and autumn and may be locally abundant. It is a firm bolete with an olive-brown cap up to 20 cm in diameter, with small orange or red pores on the underside (yellow when young). The stout ochre stem reaches 8 – high and 1 – wide, and is patterned with a red network. Like several other red-pored boletes, it stains blue when bruised or cut. Edible and good when cooked. It can cause gastric upset when eaten raw and can be confused with the poisonous Boletus satanas; as a result, some guidebooks recommend avoiding consumption altogether. When consumed with alcohol, Suillellus luridus has been implicated in causing adverse reactions similar to those caused by the compound coprine, though laboratory testing has not revealed any evidence of coprine in the mushroom. First described in 1774, the species has been transferred to various Boletaceae genera in its taxonomic history, although it retained the original name given to it by German botanist Jacob Christian Schaeffer until a transfer to genus Suillellus in 2014. Several varieties, a subspecies, and a form have been described by European mycologists. Suillellus luridus is mycorrhizal, forming a symbiotic association with broad-leaved trees trees as oak, chestnut, birch and beech, and has been found to have a growth-enhancing effect on conifers in experiments. The fruit bodies are highly attractive to, and often infested by, insects, and several species of fly have been recorded feeding on them. Chemical analyses have revealed some aspects of the mushroom's components, including its volatile flavour compounds, its fatty acid and amino acid compositions, and the identities of the carotenoid compounds responsible for its colour.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Suillellus luridus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens17
Marker genes1
eDNA detections550
Countries11
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT
The complete instruction manualSuillellus luridus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size71 020 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Suillellus luridus0.07 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type14 209 records
Wild obs. + sensor13 690
Museum / vouchered465
Other54
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO25 368 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy64% within 1 km
≤100 m 5 712≤1 km 1 801≤10 km 4 073>10 km 110
11 696 georeferenced · 1 994 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor13 690
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km
≤100 m 47≤1 km 129≤10 km 80>10 km 8
264 georeferenced · 201 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence465
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 47 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
47
Olocation not on record
43
LDlocation not on record
34
WU-MYClocation not on record
27
Karlsruhe, DE
23
BDBClocation not on record
22
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
13
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
12
Göteborg, SE
12
TUR-Alocation not on record
11
Vitoria, ES
9
Philadelphia, US
9
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
9
TROMlocation not on record
8
Salzburg, AT
8
Copenhagen, DK
6
Zürich, CH
6
Trondheim, NO
5
Burlington, US
5
Tartu, EE
5
Turku, FI
4
CJBGlocation not on record
4
Department of Plant Resources, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratorieslocation not on record
4
Ciudad de México, MX
3
Staten Island, US
3
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
3
Toronto, CA
3
Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan Universitylocation not on record
2
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Mérida, ES
1
Gijón, ES
1
Guatemala City, GT
1
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiejlocation not on record
1
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Cincinnati, US
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
1
San Sebastián, ES
1
Kuopio, FI
1
TENN-Flocation not on record
1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kewlocation not on record
1
St. Paul, US
1
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
47 institutions · 360 of 465 vouchered records shown · 101 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA550 detections
Where the DNA of Suillellus luridus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found550
Studies independent surveys5
Countries11
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 550 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
ospelund m/bjørkkalkrik blandingsskog med mye granPalearctic
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.0 °C 11.1–18.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.8 °C
Max temp (day)19.0 °C 14.2–21.2
Min temp (night)14.9 °C 7.90–16.5
Precipitation64.2 mm/mo 13.6–85.0
Air humidity62.9 % 60.2–64.2
Moisture balance-20.8 mm/mo -141–52.0
Vapour deficit740 Pa 464–797
Wind speed3.40 m/s 2.70–6.60
Cloud cover38.3 % 34.2–47.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 522 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.