Subulina octona
(Bruguière, 1789) · speciesAt a glance
Sources8 archives
Databases and archives Subulina octona's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility3 556 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Subulina octona is a species of small, tropical, air-breathing land snail, a terrestrial pulmonate gastropod mollusk in the family Achatinidae. A shell of Subulina octona from Bermuda. The shell is transparent and colorless at first, but after death it rapidly becomes opaque.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
No structured trait data for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Subulina octona has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type3 556 records
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions23 of 56 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Philadelphia, US | 671 |
| Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record | 316 |
| Cambridge, US | 269 |
| Chicago, US | 229 |
| National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record | 169 |
| The University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobagolocation not on record | 138 |
| Delaware Museum of Nature and Sciencelocation not on record | 100 |
| Sydney, AU | 77 |
| Chongqing Museumlocation not on record | 48 |
| Wellington, NZ | 45 |
| Paris, FR | 29 |
| Honolulu, US | 24 |
| Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record | 23 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 21 |
| Museums Victorialocation not on record | 21 |
| Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territorylocation not on record | 19 |
| Natick, US | 19 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 13 |
| Champaign, US | 12 |
| CASlocation not on record | 10 |
| Auckland, NZ | 10 |
| Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record | 7 |
| South Kensington, GB | 5 |
| SNSDlocation not on record | 5 |
| Washington, US | 4 |
| Muséum National d'Histoire Naturellelocation not on record | 4 |
| John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 4 |
| Denver, US | 3 |
| EL PASO, US | 3 |
| Guangxi Medical Collegelocation not on record | 3 |
| Kharazmi Universitylocation not on record | 3 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 3 |
| Florida Atlantic University, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Museumlocation not on record | 3 |
| Western Australian Museumlocation not on record | 3 |
| Museo de Historia Natural “Gustavo Orcés V"location not on record | 2 |
| Gothenburg, SE | 2 |
| QVMAGlocation not on record | 2 |
| Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 2 |
| DOI/NPS, Salem Maritime National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 2 |
| RMNHlocation not on record | 2 |
| Barcelona, ES | 2 |
| Toronto, CA | 1 |
| Paleontological Research Institutionlocation not on record | 1 |
| Tomioka, JP | 1 |
| Wakayama Prefectural Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 1 |
| Helsinki, FI | 1 |
| North Carolina Museum of Natural Scienceslocation not on record | 1 |
| Toyohashi Museum Of Natural Historylocation not on record | 1 |
| MUSE - Museo delle Scienzelocation not on record | 1 |
| Los Angeles, US | 1 |
| Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record | 1 |
| Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 1 |
| Mexico City, MX | 1 |
| Masindi, UG | 1 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 1 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Subulina octona was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.