Streptanthus tortuosus is a biennial or short lived perennial plant in the mustard family (Brassicaceae) known by the common names shieldplant, shieldleaf, and mountain jewelflower.Sierra Nevada Wildflowers, Karen Wiese, 2nd Ed. 2013, p. 30
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
⚠ sources differ — GIFT: herb · TRY: Subshrub, Forb/herb
Woodinessnon-woody
05DNA & barcoding12 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Streptanthus tortuosus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens12
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections12
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS2
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualStreptanthus tortuosus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 28 n = 14
Ploidypolyploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 281×CCDB · eflora
CCDB · eflora
n 141×CCDB · brass
CCDB · brass — Rollins
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin6.02 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 593 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 692
Museum / vouchered901
Origin
Native85
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO6 408 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy88% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 551≤1 km 219≤10 km 164>10 km 86
2 020 georeferenced · 672 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 692
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy61% within 1 km
≤100 m 34≤1 km 324≤10 km 218>10 km 14
590 georeferenced · 311 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence901
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions42 of 54 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Davis, US
121
CASlocation not on record
113
Claremont, US
91
Arcata, US
62
Angwin, US
55
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
31
Riverside, US
27
Los Angeles, US
24
San Diego, US
21
San Luis Obispo, US
18
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
15
Turlock, US
14
Santa Barbara, US
13
US
13
San Jose, US
10
Northridge, US
9
WTUlocation not on record
8
Fredericton Stock Culture Collectionlocation not on record
8
STNFlocation not on record
5
Truckee, US
5
San Francisco, US
5
KNFYlocation not on record
5
EL PASO, US
5
Fullerton, US
4
Bloomington, US
4
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
4
Wuzhou, CN
3
St. Paul, US
3
Tampa, US
2
Flagstaff, US
2
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
2
Moscow, US
2
Saint Louis, US
2
KNFHClocation not on record
2
Boise, US
2
Vancouver, CA
2
ASUlocation not on record
2
Corvallis, US
2
Bronx, US
2
Ashland, US
2
Tempe, US
1
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
1
GB
1
Brookings, US
1
Pullman, US
1
Long Beach, US
1
Pocatello, US
1
Bangkok, TH
1
Henderson, US
1
Fort Bragg, US
1
Stockholm, SE
1
San Bernardino, US
1
Mississippi State, US
1
Santa Cruz, US
1
54 institutions · 734 of 901 vouchered records shown · 167 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA12 detections
Where the DNA of Streptanthus tortuosus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found12
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 12 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.