Stereocaulon ramulosum is commonly known as snow lichen, a terricolous fruticose lichen belonging to the family Stereocaulaceae. It has cosmopolitan distribution. In the Australasian region it is common in eastern Australia, New Zealand and also recorded at Lord Howe Island and Macquarie Island. The habitat is often cooler, moist areas with a high level of cloud cover. It may be found on rocky ground or as an epiphyte on tree branches. Stereocaulon ramulosum was the first lichen known to contain an amylose polysaccharide. This species is unusual, as the fungal component is associated with two different chlorophyll forming species; usually there is only one. The more significant one is a green alga which gives the characteristic colour. The second is a cyanobacteria which is found in the cephalodia, a wart-like structure. Three different kingdoms are represented in this single life form; Fungi, Protista and Eubacteria. The generic name Stereocaulon is derived from ancient Greek stereós and Latin caulis, referring to the hard stem of the central part of the lichen. The specific epithet ramulosum is derived from the Latin ramulose, and means "having many small branches".
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Stereocaulon ramulosum across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Stereocaulon ramulosum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences2
eDNA detections2
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS2
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 154 records
Wild obs. + sensor808
Museum / vouchered2 344
Other2
Origin
Native40
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO7 244 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy85% within 1 km
≤100 m 391≤1 km 163≤10 km 66>10 km 31
651 georeferenced · 157 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor808
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy48% within 1 km
≤100 m 58≤1 km 411≤10 km 440>10 km 78
987 georeferenced · 1 357 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 344
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions44 of 79 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Hobart, AU
274
Auckland, NZ
270
UFMSlocation not on record
250
Canberra, AU
181
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
145
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
96
Berlin, DE
87
Madison, US
77
Durham, US
76
Bronx, US
66
Christchurch, NZ
61
US
60
LDlocation not on record
56
Wellington, NZ
49
ASUlocation not on record
44
Göteborg, SE
41
Mount Annan, AU
39
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
35
Stockholm, SE
34
Brisbane, AU
31
Adelaide, AU
23
St. Paul, US
23
Philadelphia, US
23
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
19
South Kensington, GB
18
PHlocation not on record
16
Olocation not on record
15
University of Gdansklocation not on record
14
AASlocation not on record
14
Chicago, US
14
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
13
PUC-RSlocation not on record
13
MeiseBGlocation not on record
12
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
11
Uppsala, SE
11
ILLSlocation not on record
10
Madrid, ES
10
AADClocation not on record
8
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record
7
Bergen, NO
7
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
7
BISHlocation not on record
7
Buenos Aires, AR
6
QVMAGlocation not on record
5
Armidale, AU
5
Wuzhou, CN
3
Helsinki, FI
3
New Haven, US
3
Champaign, US
3
Rotorua, NZ
3
Davis, US
3
Nunoa, Santiago, CL
3
US
3
WTUlocation not on record
2
EL PASO, US
2
Boise, US
2
IPA/SPlocation not on record
2
Chapel Hill, US
2
Santa Barbara, US
2
Auckland, NZ
2
Weber State Universitylocation not on record
2
Lake Charles, US
2
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
2
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
2
UFSClocation not on record
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
SIBA_UMAGlocation not on record
1
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
1
Trondheim, NO
1
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
1
IMBIVlocation not on record
1
Vancouver, CA
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Lincoln, US
1
M-Lichenslocation not on record
1
Knoxville, US
1
Turku, FI
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
79 institutions · 2 344 of 2 344 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Stereocaulon ramulosum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.