Stellaria borealis
Bigelow · speciesAt a glance
Sources8 archives
Databases and archives Stellaria borealis's data was compiled from.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility8 349 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI11 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics24 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotypeEvery layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Stellaria borealis — вид трав'янистих рослин родини Гвоздичні (Caryophyllaceae). Етимологія: лат. borealis — «північний».
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology2
Life cycle & reproduction3
Diet & foraging1
Habitat & environment6
Physiology & chemistry1
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Stellaria borealis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Stellaria borealis carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 2424×CCDB · slov-fl · CCDB · brit-fl · CCDB · iber-fl +10
2n 525×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 · CCDB · eflora
2n 263×CCDB · brit-fl · CCDB · book-indian_vol1 · CCDB · book-atlas-flowering-plants
2n 361×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
2n 391×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
n 262×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
n 121×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
polyploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
Record type8 349 records
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions47 of 79 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Olocation not on record | 583 |
| Helsinki, FI | 315 |
| LDlocation not on record | 234 |
| Oulu, FI | 208 |
| TROMlocation not on record | 200 |
| Trondheim, NO | 128 |
| Turku, FI | 81 |
| Oskarshamn, SE | 52 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 43 |
| Bergen, NO | 38 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 35 |
| Garðabær, IS | 21 |
| Kuopio, FI | 18 |
| Missoula, US | 13 |
| KMNlocation not on record | 12 |
| nbflocation not on record | 10 |
| TUR-Alocation not on record | 10 |
| Saint John, CA | 9 |
| Bozeman, US | 9 |
| Bloomington, US | 8 |
| Québec, CA | 8 |
| Jyväskylä, FI | 8 |
| DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record | 8 |
| Green Bay, US | 7 |
| Stockholm, SE | 7 |
| Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record | 7 |
| NMBU:MINAlocation not on record | 7 |
| Yukon Universitylocation not on record | 7 |
| Madison, US | 6 |
| University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record | 6 |
| Vancouver, CA | 6 |
| 6 | |
| Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratorylocation not on record | 5 |
| Pullman, US | 5 |
| BRNUlocation not on record | 5 |
| Rovaniemi, FI | 5 |
| Acadia Universitylocation not on record | 5 |
| Uppsala, SE | 4 |
| Université Lavallocation not on record | 4 |
| Corvallis, US | 4 |
| Tampa, US | 3 |
| WTUlocation not on record | 3 |
| Emporia, US | 3 |
| Victoria, CA | 3 |
| Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record | 3 |
| Whitehorse, CA | 3 |
| St. Paul, US | 3 |
| Provo, US | 2 |
| Chongqing Museumlocation not on record | 2 |
| Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record | 2 |
| Moscow, US | 2 |
| Finnish Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 2 |
| Kandalaksha State Nature Reservelocation not on record | 2 |
| Research Collection of B. A. Bennettlocation not on record | 2 |
| Denver, US | 1 |
| Science Museum of Minnesotalocation not on record | 1 |
| Washington, US | 1 |
| Philadelphia, US | 1 |
| Montréal, CA | 1 |
| McGill University, Herbariumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Wlocation not on record | 1 |
| Tromso University Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Tempe, US | 1 |
| Bronx, US | 1 |
| Porvoo, FI | 1 |
| Logan, US | 1 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| University of British Columbialocation not on record | 1 |
| Berlin, DE | 1 |
| Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record | 1 |
| Ashland, US | 1 |
| Paris, FR | 1 |
| Cheney, US | 1 |
| Claremont, US | 1 |
| Portland, US | 1 |
| BClocation not on record | 1 |
| Toronto, CA | 1 |
| Mississippi State, US | 1 |
| BioFokuslocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Stellaria borealis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.