A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Staurothele fissa has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections3
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
07Deep time~19.2 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin19.2 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 271 records
Wild obs. + sensor539
Museum / vouchered731
Other1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 420 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy41% within 1 km
≤100 m 122≤1 km 93≤10 km 285>10 km 20
520 georeferenced · 19 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor539
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 36≤1 km 43≤10 km 155>10 km 85
319 georeferenced · 412 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence731
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions31 of 63 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Uppsala, SE
200
Madison, US
73
BDBClocation not on record
51
St. Paul, US
35
LDlocation not on record
34
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
28
ASUlocation not on record
22
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
19
14
Vancouver, CA
13
Durham, US
12
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
10
Bronx, US
9
Minia, EG
9
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
9
Université Lavallocation not on record
8
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
8
Olocation not on record
7
Chapel Hill, US
7
Ann Arbor, US
7
Staatsarchiv Urilocation not on record
7
Chicago, US
7
Bergen, NO
7
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
7
Boise, US
6
GZUlocation not on record
6
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
6
nbflocation not on record
5
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
5
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
5
WTUlocation not on record
4
Mlocation not on record
4
Bozeman, US
4
Berlin, DE
4
Helsinki, FI
4
US
3
Philadelphia, US
3
University of Manitobalocation not on record
3
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
3
Weber State Universitylocation not on record
3
South Kensington, GB
3
ILLSlocation not on record
3
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
2
CLUlocation not on record
2
Metsähallituslocation not on record
2
BClocation not on record
2
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Madrid, ES
1
Davis, US
1
Santa Barbara, US
1
Barcelona, ES
1
M-Lichenslocation not on record
1
Porvoo, FI
1
Hobart, AU
1
Göteborg, SE
1
Logan, US
1
Servico de Microbiologia e Imunologialocation not on record
1
US
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Trondheim, NO
1
Salzburg, AT
1
63 institutions · 702 of 731 vouchered records shown · 29 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Staurothele fissa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys2
Countries1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.6 °C 15.6–15.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.2 °C
Max temp (day)19.2 °C
Min temp (night)11.6 °C
Precipitation94.4 mm/mo
Air humidity60.9 %
Moisture balance-7.50 mm/mo
Vapour deficit696 Pa
Wind speed3.50 m/s
Cloud cover44.0 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
