Spodoptera frugiperda
J.E.Smith, 1797 · speciesAt a glance
Sources12 archives
Databases and archives Spodoptera frugiperda's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation12 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility11 910 records↗
OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System2 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI4 166 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics4 030 specimens↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) is a species in the order Lepidoptera and one of the species of the fall armyworm moths distinguished by their larval life stage. The term "armyworm" can refer to several species, often describing the large-scale invasive behavior of the species' larval stage. It is regarded as a pest and can damage and destroy a wide variety of crops, which causes large economic damage. Its scientific name derives from frugiperda, which is Latin for lost fruit, named because of the species' ability to destroy crops. Because of its propensity for destruction, the fall armyworm's habits and possibilities for crop protection have been studied in depth. It is also a notable case for studying sympatric speciation, as it appears to be diverging into two species currently. Another remarkable trait of the larva is that they consistently practice cannibalism, despite its fitness costs. The fall armyworm is active at a different time of year from the true armyworm, another species in the order Lepidoptera and family Noctuidae, but of the genus Mythimna. Outbreaks of the true armyworm usually occur during the early part of the summer; the fall armyworm does most damage in the late summer in the southern part of the United States, and early fall in the northern regions.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
No structured trait data for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Spodoptera frugiperda across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Documented compounds18 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| (-)-alpha-Tocopherol | present | NPASS | |
| (2R)-2,3-Dihydroxypropyl 5-deoxy-5-(dimethylarsinyl)-beta-D-ribofuranoside | present | NPASS | |
| (2R)-2,8-Dimethyl-2-[(4S,8S)-4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl]-3,4-dihydrochromen-6-ol | present | NPASS | |
| (2S)-2,5,8-trimethyl-2-[(4S,8S)-4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl]-3,4-dihydrochromen-6-ol | present | NPASS | |
| (2S)-2,7,8-trimethyl-2-[(4S,8S)-4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl]-3,4-dihydrochromen-6-ol | present | NPASS | |
| (2S)-5-amino-2-[[(9Z,12Z,15Z,17R)-17-hydroxyoctadeca-9,12,15-trienoyl]amino]-5-oxopentanoic acid | present | LOTUS | |
| (E,E)-2,4-Octadienal | present | NPASS | |
| (R)-oct-1-en-3-ol | present | NPASS | |
| GPGHDFGTUWSQOQ-VFCFLDTKSA-N | present | NPASS | |
| GTSZMQQESJQGCI-MBXMOIHESA-N | present | NPASS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Spodoptera frugiperda has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
The complete instruction manual Spodoptera frugiperda carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type11 912 records
Origin
Range
Depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions20 of 46 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record | 173 |
| Mississippi State, US | 160 |
| Cambridge, US | 159 |
| New Haven, US | 143 |
| East Lansing, US | 114 |
| Georgia Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 106 |
| King Saud Universitylocation not on record | 100 |
| Tapachula, MX | 64 |
| FS-UDolocation not on record | 64 |
| San Diego, US | 50 |
| St. Paul, US | 48 |
| The University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobagolocation not on record | 44 |
| CUlocation not on record | 33 |
| DPIlocation not on record | 32 |
| Cleveland Museum of Natural History, OH (CLEV)location not on record | 23 |
| University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record | 14 |
| PUC-RSlocation not on record | 13 |
| US | 12 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 11 |
| OSUClocation not on record | 9 |
| Albuquerque, US | 8 |
| Ciudad de México, MX | 6 |
| Denver, US | 5 |
| Washington, US | 4 |
| UNICAMPlocation not on record | 4 |
| SOVTlocation not on record | 4 |
| Toronto, CA | 4 |
| ZSMlocation not on record | 4 |
| München, DE | 3 |
| ASUlocation not on record | 2 |
| Champaign, US | 2 |
| Philadelphia, US | 2 |
| Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record | 2 |
| Decorah, US | 2 |
| University of California, Davislocation not on record | 2 |
| Chicago, US | 2 |
| tesrilocation not on record | 2 |
| Research Collection of J. B. Sullivanlocation not on record | 1 |
| Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Awka, NG | 1 |
| University of Pennsylvanialocation not on record | 1 |
| Los Angeles, US | 1 |
| Cornell University Insect Collectionlocation not on record | 1 |
| University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shimogalocation not on record | 1 |
| University of Marylandlocation not on record | 1 |
| North Carolina State University Insect Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Spodoptera frugiperda was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.