Spiranthes praecox, the grass leaved ladies' tresses (sometimes spelled grassleaf ladies'-tresses), green-vein ladies'-tresses or sometimes giant ladies' tresses is a terrestrial orchid endemic to the United States, growing on the eastern coastal plains and around the Gulf Coast.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Spiranthes praecox has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK9★rbcL1★ITS
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 575 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 129
Museum / vouchered446
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 772 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy55% within 1 km
≤100 m 424≤1 km 115≤10 km 27>10 km 408
974 georeferenced · 155 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 129
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy27% within 1 km
≤100 m 23≤1 km 28≤10 km 89>10 km 51
191 georeferenced · 255 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence446
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions32 of 45 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Tampa, US
67
Philadelphia, US
49
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
49
Jackson, US
29
Miami, US
28
Bronx, US
20
US
20
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
19
South Kensington, GB
17
Madison, US
14
Fort Worth, US
10
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
10
Austin, US
9
Chapel Hill, US
7
New Haven, US
7
Tuscaloosa, US
6
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
6
Bangkok, TH
6
Little Rock, US
6
University of South Carolina Salkehatchielocation not on record
5
Columbia, US
5
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
4
Wuzhou, CN
4
Bloomington, US
4
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
4
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
3
GAlocation not on record
3
Staten Island, US
3
Saint Louis, US
3
Williamsburg, US
3
Clemson, US
2
Knoxville, US
2
San Angelo, US
2
Norfolk, US
2
Mississippi State, US
2
AUAlocation not on record
1
North Carolina Museum of Natural Scienceslocation not on record
1
Davenport, US
1
Audubon Society -- Silver Bluff Audubon Center and Sanctuarylocation not on record
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
BAYLUlocation not on record
1
Chadron, US
1
Beijing, CN
1
Millersville, US
1
Flagstaff, US
1
45 institutions · 440 of 446 vouchered records shown · 6 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Spiranthes praecox was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.