Sphaerocarpos texanus, the Texas balloonwort, is a species of liverwort in the Sphaerocarpaceae family, found in the Americas, northern Africa and Europe.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Sphaerocarpos texanus across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile1 class
Flavones1
Documented compounds1 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
Luteolin 7-glucuronide
present
LOTUS
05DNA & barcoding3 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Sphaerocarpos texanus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections2
Countries7
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Sphaerocarpos texanus voucher Ghullam, M. TG1868439155 (E) ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcL10
plant barcode
07Deep time~45.9 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin45.9 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 420 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 860
Museum / vouchered559
Other1
Origin
Native3
Introduced2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 380 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 058≤1 km 343≤10 km 129>10 km 12
1 542 georeferenced · 318 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 860
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy48% within 1 km
≤100 m 13≤1 km 131≤10 km 115>10 km 44
303 georeferenced · 256 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence559
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions35 of 48 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bronx, US
107
Brussel, BE
100
Knoxville, US
40
MeiseBGlocation not on record
34
New Haven, US
30
Durham, US
23
Saint Louis, US
22
South Kensington, GB
14
Vancouver, CA
10
US
10
Canberra, AU
9
San Jose, US
7
Tilburg, NL
6
Museo della Bonifica di San Donà di Piavelocation not on record
6
Calabar, NG
6
Madison, US
6
Universidad de Oviedolocation not on record
6
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
6
Chicago, US
6
Fayetteville, US
5
CASlocation not on record
4
Madrid, ES
3
Edinburgh, GB
3
Salamanca, ES
3
Lubbock, US
2
MAlocation not on record
2
Paris, FR
2
San Diego, US
2
Brisbane, AU
2
Mount Annan, AU
2
Corvallis, US
2
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
2
Portland, US
2
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Karlsruhe (State Museum of Natural History)location not on record
2
Blacksburg, US
2
Northridge, US
2
Auckland, NZ
1
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
1
Henderson, US
1
Granada, ES
1
MHN-UPlocation not on record
1
Coimbra, PT
1
Cincinnati, US
1
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
1
Slovak National Museumlocation not on record
1
Pittsburg, US
1
Davis, US
1
AADClocation not on record
1
48 institutions · 502 of 559 vouchered records shown · 56 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Sphaerocarpos texanus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median1.10 °C 1.10–1.10
Seasonal swing summer↔winter27.0 °C
Max temp (day)7.50 °C
Min temp (night)-3.20 °C
Precipitation30.7 mm/mo
Air humidity58.4 %
Moisture balance-19.3 mm/mo
Vapour deficit281 Pa
Wind speed5.80 m/s
Cloud cover42.0 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.