Sparassis crispa, de ses noms vernaculaires le Sparassis crépu, Clavaire crépue, Morille des pins, Morille Blanche, Morille d'automne, Crête de coq ou Chou-fleur, ou communement appelée gallinette en Provence, est une espèce de champignons basidiomycètes, cérébriformes, comestibles jeunes, de la famille des Sparassidacées.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Sparassis crispa across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
🍽 Used in cooking
Compound class profile5 classes
Eudesmane sesquiterpenoids9
Phthalide derivatives3
Iridoids monoterpenoids2
Shikimic acids and derivatives $ Simple phenolic acids2
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Sparassis crispa has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens38
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections50
Countries10
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Sparassis crispa SBK220726_01 genes for 18S ribosomal RNA, internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA, partial and complete sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS10★ITS1
animal barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualSparassis crispa carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈39 020 349 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
THIS GENOME Sparassis crispa0.04 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelContig
Completeness95.2% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type34 486 records
Wild obs. + sensor33 766
Museum / vouchered693
Cultivated / captive1
Other26
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO42 176 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy40% within 1 km
≤100 m 8 665≤1 km 2 863≤10 km 17 174>10 km 420
29 122 georeferenced · 4 644 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor33 766
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy51% within 1 km
≤100 m 74≤1 km 122≤10 km 146>10 km 44
386 georeferenced · 307 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence693
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions44 of 79 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
110
Uppsala, SE
48
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
40
Helsinki, FI
32
TENN-Flocation not on record
30
Copenhagen, DK
26
BDBClocation not on record
25
GJOlocation not on record
16
Görlitz, DE
16
Karlsruhe, DE
13
Kew, GB
11
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
10
Osaka, JP
10
LDlocation not on record
10
Ann Arbor, US
9
Göteborg, SE
8
Chicago, US
8
Vancouver, CA
7
Turku, FI
7
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
7
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
7
Burlington, US
6
Blacksburg, US
6
Champaign, US
5
Jyväskylä, FI
5
MeiseBGlocation not on record
5
Zapopan, MX
5
San Sebastián, ES
5
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
5
Warsaw, PL
4
WU-MYClocation not on record
3
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
3
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
3
Joensuu, FI
3
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
3
Mlocation not on record
3
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
3
Berlin, DE
2
Bardejov, SK
2
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
2
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
2
nsnflocation not on record
2
Tomioka, JP
2
ILLSlocation not on record
2
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
2
Metsähallituslocation not on record
2
Tartu, EE
2
Staten Island, US
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Vitoria, ES
2
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
2
Pullman, US
2
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
2
Kathmandu, NP
2
Chapel Hill, US
2
Oulu, FI
1
Durango, MX
1
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
1
Denver, US
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
1
University of Warsawlocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
Lake Charles, US
1
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
1
Durham, US
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
St. Paul, US
1
Oskarshamn, SE
1
Bronx, US
1
Auckland, NZ
1
UFSClocation not on record
1
Clemson, US
1
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecologylocation not on record
1
Paris, FR
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Trondheim, NO
1
CABI Bioscience Genetic Resource Collectionlocation not on record
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
79 institutions · 577 of 693 vouchered records shown · 93 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA50 detections
Where the DNA of Sparassis crispa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found50
Studies independent surveys2
Countries9
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 50 detections have coordinates
Open the map9 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.5 °C 8.30–12.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter27.0 °C
Max temp (day)18.4 °C 11.5–18.4
Min temp (night)8.20 °C 4.60–8.20
Precipitation79.6 mm/mo 58.1–147
Air humidity57.3 % 57.3–64.0
Moisture balance-38.4 mm/mo -38.4–68.6
Vapour deficit733 Pa 439–733
Wind speed5.80 m/s 2.70–5.80
Cloud cover36.7 % 36.7–44.5
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 25 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.