La sorbaire de Kirilov, ou fausse spirée de Kirilov, est une espèce de plantes à fleurs de la famille des Rosaceae. C'est un arbuste originaire de Chine. Nom chinois : 华北珍珠梅.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Sorbaria kirilowii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections6
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Sorbaria kirilowii isolate 130 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK5★rbcL1★ITS4
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualSorbaria kirilowii carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Song, W. q., X. l. Li & Y. l. Chen. 1989. Studies on the karyotype evolution and relationship of Maloideae. Pp. 327--333 in D. Hong (editor), Plant Chromosome Research 1987.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Chen, R. y., W. q. Song, X. l. Li, M. x. Li, G. l. Liang & C. b. Chen. 2003. Chromosome Atlas of Major Economic Plants Genome in China, Vol. 3, Chromosome Atlas of Garden Flowering Plants in China. Science Press, Beijing.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy63% within 1 km
≤100 m 87≤1 km 28≤10 km 66>10 km 2
183 georeferenced · 11 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor194
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy86% within 1 km
≤100 m 18≤1 km 13≤10 km 5
36 georeferenced · 567 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence603
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 3 records without
Open the mapnot free-living3
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 60 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Yangling, CN
235
Beijing, CN
106
Taiyuan Normal Universitylocation not on record
26
Cambridge, US
24
Beijing Normal Universitylocation not on record
24
Xining, CN
18
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
16
Nanjing, CN
13
Tianjin Natural History Museumlocation not on record
11
WNNUlocation not on record
10
KR
9
Shanxi Institute of Biologylocation not on record
9
Taipei, TW
6
Lanzhou, CN
5
LDlocation not on record
5
Guilin, CN
5
Kunming, CN
5
Institute for Agricultural Bacteriology and Fermentation Biologylocation not on record
5
WTUlocation not on record
4
Chengdu, CN
4
FFPRIlocation not on record
4
Central China Agricultural Universitylocation not on record
3
Xian, CN
3
Institute of Applied Ecology, Academia Sinicalocation not on record
3
Kew, GB
3
Oskarshamn, SE
2
Chiba, JP
2
Nijmegen, NL
2
GJOlocation not on record
2
Nagano City, JP
2
Changsha, CN
2
Xinxiang, CN
2
Guangzhou, CN
2
Shanghai, CN
2
Northeastern Forestry Universitylocation not on record
2
MeiseBGlocation not on record
2
Shanxi Universitylocation not on record
2
ENTClocation not on record
1
Nishihara, JP
1
Nanjing, CN
1
Zhuzhou, CN
1
Southwest Forestry Collegelocation not on record
1
Jiangxi Universitylocation not on record
1
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
1
Strecker Museum, Baylor Universitylocation not on record
1
Tomioka, JP
1
Davis, US
1
Jiangxi College of Educationlocation not on record
1
Fujian Institute of Subtropical Botanylocation not on record
1
Chengdu, CN
1
Zhengzhou, CN
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Tsukuba, JP
1
University of New Hampshirelocation not on record
1
DBF-NHMDlocation not on record
1
Odawara, JP
1
Seoul, KR
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
1
60 institutions · 603 of 603 vouchered records shown
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Sorbaria kirilowii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.