Dendroseris pruinata is a species of flowering plant in the family Asteraceae. It is found only in the Juan Fernández Islands of Chile. It is threatened by habitat loss.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Sonchus pruinatus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences4
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL2
plant barcode
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Sonchus pruinatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.1 °C 14.1–14.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.4 °C
Max temp (day)20.5 °C
Min temp (night)8.70 °C
Precipitation145 mm/mo
Air humidity58.8 %
Moisture balance39.0 mm/mo
Vapour deficit702 Pa
Wind speed2.50 m/s
Cloud cover20.8 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
