Solidago ptarmicoides, the prairie goldenrod, white flat-top goldenrod or upland white aster, is a North American perennial flowering plant in the family Asteraceae. It is native to the central and eastern Canada (from New Brunswick to Manitoba) and parts of the United States (mostly Great Lakes region, the Northeast, the Ozarks, and the northern Great Plains, with isolated populations in Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma, and scattered locations in the Southeast. It has also been called upland white solidago, upland white goldenrod, and sneezewort goldenrod
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Solidago ptarmicoides across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Dibenzylbutyrolactone lignans19
Simple coumarins6
Furofuranoid lignans2
Arylnaphthalene and aryltetralin lignans $ Dibenzylbutyrolactone lignans2
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Solidago ptarmicoides has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens18
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections12
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL5★rbcLa★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualSolidago ptarmicoides carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size929 100 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Solidago ptarmicoides0.93 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Love, A. & D. Love. 1982. In: A Löve (ed.), IOPB chromosome number reports LXXV. Taxon 31(2): 344–360.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Semple, J. C., G. S. Ringius, C. Leeder & G. Morton. 1984. Chromosome numbers of goldenrods, Euthamia and Solidago (Compositae: Astereae). II. Additional counts with comments on cytogeography. Brittonia 36(3): 280–292 [erratum 37: 121].
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Semple, J. C., J. G. Chmielewski & C. Xiang. 1992. Chromosome number determinations in fam. Compositae, tribe Astereae. IV. Additional reports and comments on the cytogeography and status of some species of Aster and Solidago. Rhodora 94: 48–62.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — GERVAIS, C., R. Trahan & J. Gagnon. 1999. IOPB chromosome data 14. Newslett. Int. Organ. Pl. Biosyst. (Oslo) 30: 10–15.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Morton, J. K. 1981. Chromosome numbers in Compositae from Canada and the U.S.A. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 357–368.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — MULLIGAN, G. A. 1967. In IOPB chromosome number reports XI. Taxon 16: 215-222.
CCDB · eflora
CCDB · Cave1956 — Huziwara a
CCDB · Cave1958 — Huziwara 1958b
n 91×CCDB · Cave1963
CCDB · Cave1963 — Van Faasen 1963
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy77% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 016≤1 km 174≤10 km 72>10 km 281
1 543 georeferenced · 406 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 949
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy46% within 1 km
≤100 m 55≤1 km 181≤10 km 245>10 km 29
510 georeferenced · 435 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence945
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions43 of 66 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
St. Paul, US
197
Chicago, US
118
Madison, US
95
Bronx, US
85
Montréal, CA
85
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
41
Saint Louis, US
31
Ann Arbor, US
30
Wuzhou, CN
28
Spearfish, US
24
Université Lavallocation not on record
17
Québec, CA
16
Dekalb, US
11
WINlocation not on record
10
Little Rock, US
9
Toronto, CA
9
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
9
Denver, US
8
Missoula, US
7
Vancouver, CA
6
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
6
Bloomington, US
5
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
5
Chadron, US
5
USFS/BHSClocation not on record
4
Bangkok, TH
4
James F. Matthews Center for Biodiversity Studieslocation not on record
3
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
3
Science Museum of Minnesotalocation not on record
3
Chapel Hill, US
3
LDlocation not on record
3
University of Guelph, OAC Herbariumlocation not on record
3
Provo, US
3
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
3
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Chicago, US
2
Boise, US
2
Moscow, US
2
San Angelo, US
2
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
2
LPMMBHlocation not on record
2
GB
2
Austin, US
2
Riverside, US
2
Whitewater, US
2
Logan, US
2
Green Bay, US
2
Emporia, US
2
University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record
2
Flagstaff, US
2
Portland, US
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
Corvallis, US
1
Springfield, US
1
Podgorica, ME
1
Olocation not on record
1
University of Wisconsinlocation not on record
1
University of Lethbridgelocation not on record
1
Paris, FR
1
Columbus State Universitylocation not on record
1
Brookings, US
1
Knoxville, US
1
Bozeman, US
1
New Haven, US
1
BClocation not on record
1
66 institutions · 938 of 945 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA12 detections
Where the DNA of Solidago ptarmicoides was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found12
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 12 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
North of road in large alvar dominated by Sp…Plants growing on alvars dominated by Sporob…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.1 °C 12.3–23.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter28.9 °C
Max temp (day)20.5 °C 14.7–27.9
Min temp (night)14.8 °C 10.7–18.9
Precipitation101 mm/mo 84.4–119
Air humidity60.3 % 59.3–61.5
Moisture balance-42.9 mm/mo -64.4–32.2
Vapour deficit760 Pa 569–1,173
Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.30–4.20
Cloud cover40.7 % 35.6–50.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.