Solidago fistulosa, the pine barren goldenrod, is a plant species native to low-lying coastal areas of eastern North America. It grows in every state bordering on the Gulf of Mexico or on the Atlantic Ocean from Louisiana to New Jersey.Biota of North America Program 2014 county distribution map It is generally found in bogs, along the edges of marshes, in drainage ditches, etc.Flora of North America, Solidago fistulosa, Miller, 1768. Pine-barren goldenrod Solidago fistulosa is an herb up to 150 cm (5 feet) tall, spreading by underground rhizomes. It has winged petioles, broad leaf blades, and sometimes as many as 500 small yellow flower heads born in large branching arrays.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Solidago fistulosa across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Solidago fistulosa has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens4
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences6
eDNA detections3
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL2★rbcLa★ITS2★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualSolidago fistulosa carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 183×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · eflora
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Semple, J. C. 1985. Chromosome number determinations in fam. Compositae tribe Astereae. Rhodora 87: 517–527.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Semple, J. C., J. Zhang & C. Xiang. 1993. Chromosome number determinations in fam. Compositae, tribe Astereae. V. Eastern North American taxa. Rhodora 95: 234–253.
CCDB · eflora
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy89% within 1 km
≤100 m 528≤1 km 90≤10 km 31>10 km 46
695 georeferenced · 151 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor846
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy28% within 1 km
≤100 m 23≤1 km 58≤10 km 137>10 km 71
289 georeferenced · 411 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence700
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions36 of 55 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Tampa, US
128
Philadelphia, US
105
Bronx, US
45
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
45
Chicago, US
44
Bangkok, TH
34
Miami, US
34
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
22
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
22
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
19
Bloomington, US
18
Williamsburg, US
15
US
15
Columbia, US
14
Chapel Hill, US
11
GAlocation not on record
10
College Park, US
10
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
10
Montréal, CA
7
Jackson, US
6
Staten Island, US
5
Tuscaloosa, US
5
Norfolk, US
5
Saint Louis, US
5
Mississippi State, US
4
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
4
Clemson, US
4
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
4
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
3
Longwood Universitylocation not on record
3
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
3
University of South Carolina Salkehatchielocation not on record
3
Dover, US
2
James F. Matthews Center for Biodiversity Studieslocation not on record
2
Maryland Department of Natural Resourceslocation not on record
2
Burlington, US
2
Knoxville, US
2
Denver, US
1
Due West, US
1
Little Rock, US
1
Minia, EG
1
EL PASO, US
1
North Carolina Museum of Natural Scienceslocation not on record
1
AUAlocation not on record
1
Weymouth Woods Sandhills Nature Preservelocation not on record
1
Millersville, US
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
Fredericksburg, US
1
Fort Worth, US
1
US
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
San Angelo, US
1
Waverly, US
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
55 institutions · 690 of 700 vouchered records shown · 10 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Solidago fistulosa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.