⚠ sources differ — GIFT: 0.065 m · LEDA: 0.065 m · TRY: 0.079 m
Plant height generative0.125 m
Plant height max0.15 m
Plant height min0.05 m
Seed length1.31 mm
Seed mass0.239 mg
Life cycle & reproduction7
Deciduousnessevergreen
Dispersal typeself
Flowering endJul
Flowering startApr
Life formperennial
Life spanperennial
Raunkiær life formhemicryptophyte
Diet & foraging1
Parasiteindependent
Habitat & environment5
Climatesubalpine or subarctic
Climberself-supporting
Growth formherb
Mycorrhiza type0.000000117
Woodinessnon-woody
Physiology & chemistry6
Leaf C:N ratio23.16 g/g
Leaf c464 mg/g
Leaf dry-matter content (LDMC)237 mg/g
Leaf n20.7 mg/g
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Seed longevity index0
Other traits1
Diaspore typeseed
05DNA & barcoding11 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Soldanella alpina has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens11
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections9
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Soldanella alpina ITS1, 5.8S rRNA gene and ITS2, isolate SOL
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL1★trnL★ITS6★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type54 580 records
Wild obs. + sensor53 114
Museum / vouchered1 262
Cultivated / captive10
Other194
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO32 644 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy30% within 1 km
≤100 m 9 405≤1 km 3 539≤10 km 29 063>10 km 1 014
43 021 georeferenced · 10 093 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor53 114
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy38% within 1 km
≤100 m 51≤1 km 275≤10 km 515>10 km 14
855 georeferenced · 407 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 262
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤1 km 4
4 georeferenced · 6 without coordinates
Open the mapnot free-living10
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions30 of 60 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Salzburg, AT
324
Zürich, CH
272
Zürich, CH
216
BFLlocation not on record
41
LDlocation not on record
37
Oskarshamn, SE
29
Bern, CH
28
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
24
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
20
Karlsruhe, DE
20
GJOlocation not on record
19
BDBClocation not on record
16
Glarus, CH
15
Wlocation not on record
11
Porrentruy, CH
11
BClocation not on record
10
Görlitz, DE
10
BRNUlocation not on record
9
SZUlocation not on record
9
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
9
LfUlocation not on record
7
Barcelona, ES
7
MAlocation not on record
5
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
5
Mlocation not on record
5
MeiseBGlocation not on record
5
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Karlsruhe (State Museum of Natural History)location not on record
4
Wellington, NZ
4
CJBGlocation not on record
4
GZUlocation not on record
4
Paris, FR
4
Boise, US
3
Sion, CH
3
Herb. BBGlocation not on record
3
Helsinki, FI
2
Göteborg, SE
2
Monastir, TN
2
Boumlocation not on record
1
Saint Louis, US
1
Berlin, DE
1
Badajoz, ES
1
College of the Atlantic, Museumlocation not on record
1
Columbia, US
1
Glocation not on record
1
Xiamen, CN
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
Frankfurt am Main
1
València, ES
1
Vitoria, ES
1
Muséum Henri Lecoqlocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
Bangkok, TH
1
Alicante, ES
1
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record
1
PRClocation not on record
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
ULBF-AGRlocation not on record
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Madrid, ES
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
60 institutions · 1 222 of 1 262 vouchered records shown · 35 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA9 detections
Where the DNA of Soldanella alpina was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found9
Studies independent surveys1
Countries4
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 9 detections have coordinates
Open the map4 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median7.00 °C 0.7–15.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.8 °C
Max temp (day)11.2 °C 4.20–20.1
Min temp (night)2.10 °C -4.40–9.00
Precipitation170 mm/mo 33.4–244
Air humidity60.2 % 52.9–63.0
Moisture balance100 mm/mo -61.7–174
Vapour deficit403 Pa 290–953
Wind speed2.60 m/s 2.00–5.40
Cloud cover42.1 % 38.3–46.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.