Habitat GIFTCampinarana, Floresta Ciliar ou Galeria
Woodinessnon-woody
05DNA & barcoding4 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Sobralia macrophylla has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens4
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences6
eDNA detections4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK3★ITS3
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type187 records
Wild obs. + sensor52
Museum / vouchered135
Origin
Native2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO496 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy73% within 1 km
≤100 m 16≤1 km 13≤10 km 7>10 km 4
40 georeferenced · 12 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor52
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy17% within 1 km
≤1 km 7≤10 km 13>10 km 21
41 georeferenced · 94 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence135
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions11 of 33 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
20
Saint Louis, US
16
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
11
Aarhus, DK
6
Fundación Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe de Medellín (JBM)location not on record
5
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
5
Chicago, US
5
Xiamen, CN
4
Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas - SINCHIlocation not on record
4
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
4
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
3
Bronx, US
3
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
3
Universidad Católica de Oriente (UCO)location not on record
3
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Ministry of Agriculturelocation not on record
2
Harvard Universitylocation not on record
2
JBRJlocation not on record
2
Paris, FR
2
Station d'Ecologie de Lamtolocation not on record
2
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record
2
Anton de Kom University of Surinamelocation not on record
2
Kew, GB
1
Fundación Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe de Medellínlocation not on record
1
Universiti Sains Malaysialocation not on record
1
Universidad de la Amazonia (UniAmazonia)location not on record
1
arosemena tola, EC
1
Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó (UTCH)location not on record
1
Iquitos, PE
1
Quito, EC
1
Río Palenque Science Centerlocation not on record
1
UEMAlocation not on record
1
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
33 institutions · 118 of 135 vouchered records shown · 17 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Sobralia macrophylla was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.