A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Sobralia fragrans has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences3
eDNA detections2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★ITS1
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type377 records
Wild obs. + sensor32
Museum / vouchered344
Cultivated / captive1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO852 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy61% within 1 km
≤100 m 8≤1 km 3≤10 km 3>10 km 4
18 georeferenced · 14 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor32
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy95% within 1 km
≤100 m 108≤1 km 9≤10 km 5>10 km 1
123 georeferenced · 221 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence344
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
>10 km 1
1 georeferenced
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions21 of 39 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
92
Mexico City, MX
90
Durango, MX
30
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
13
Bronx, US
9
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record
8
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
7
San Francisco, US
7
León, NI
7
Instituto Chinoin, A.C.location not on record
6
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
6
Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas - SINCHIlocation not on record
5
Austin, US
5
Chapingo, MX
5
Station d'Ecologie de Lamtolocation not on record
3
Aarhus, DK
3
QCNElocation not on record
3
Harvard Universitylocation not on record
3
Montecillo, Texcoco, MX
3
Durham, US
3
Chicago, US
2
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
2
San José, CR
2
Paris, FR
2
San Francisco de Campeche, MX
2
CASlocation not on record
2
South Kensington, GB
2
Xiamen, CN
2
Anton de Kom University of Surinamelocation not on record
1
Berlin, DE
1
Austin, US
1
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
1
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
1
California Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
1
Provincial Museum of Albertalocation not on record
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
Mérida, MX
1
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
1
MEXUlocation not on record
1
39 institutions · 335 of 344 vouchered records shown · 9 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Sobralia fragrans was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.