Serpocaulon sessilifolium is a species of fern in the family Polypodiaceae. It is native to Costa Rica and northern and western South America (Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Guyana). Under the synonym Polypodium rimbachii, it was regarded as endemic to Ecuador and threatened by habitat loss.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Serpocaulon sessilifolium has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences2
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcL2
plant barcode
07Deep time~14.4 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin14.4 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 652 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 377
Museum / vouchered275
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO708 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy80% within 1 km
≤100 m 4≤10 km 1
5 georeferenced · 1 372 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 377
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy15% within 1 km
≤100 m 2≤1 km 2≤10 km 20>10 km 3
27 georeferenced · 248 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence275
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions21 of 41 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
88
Bronx, US
23
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
19
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
13
La Paz, BO
13
Cusco, PE
12
Universiti Sains Malaysialocation not on record
11
South Kensington, GB
10
Fundación Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe de Medellín (JBM)location not on record
9
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
6
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
5
Herbario Selva Central Oxapampa - estación biológica del Jardín Botánico de Missourilocation not on record
5
HUT Culture Collectionlocation not on record
5
Fort Worth, US
5
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)location not on record
5
Universidad del Valle (UniValle)location not on record
5
Calabar, NG
4
Jardín Botánico José Celestino Mutis (JBBJCM)location not on record
3
UTPLlocation not on record
2
Aarhus, DK
2
Guatemala City, GT
2
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, BO
2
Iquitos, PE
2
Cochabamba, BO
2
Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas - SINCHIlocation not on record
2
Berlin, DE
1
Chicago, US
1
QCNElocation not on record
1
Corporación Autónoma Regional Para la Defensa de la Meseta de Bucaramanga (CDMB)location not on record
1
Lima, PE
1
Burlington, US
1
IAvHlocation not on record
1
Tampa, US
1
HUAlocation not on record
1
Philadelphia, US
1
UFPRlocation not on record
1
arosemena tola, EC
1
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
1
Universidad de Caldas (UCaldas)location not on record
1
Austin, US
1
Quito, EC
1
41 institutions · 271 of 275 vouchered records shown · 2 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Serpocaulon sessilifolium was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median24.1 °C 24.1–24.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter5.30 °C
Max temp (day)27.8 °C
Min temp (night)20.6 °C
Precipitation170 mm/mo
Air humidity65.0 %
Moisture balance49.9 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,049 Pa
Wind speed1.30 m/s
Cloud cover48.7 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.