Шлемник седой — вид многолетнего цветкового растения семейства Яснотковые (Lamiaceae). Аборигенный вид Северной Америки и в основном встречается на востоке Соединенных Штатов, а также в некоторых частях Среднего Запада.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Scutellaria incana has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 049 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 354
Museum / vouchered694
Other1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 368 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy81% within 1 km
≤100 m 808≤1 km 130≤10 km 68>10 km 154
1 160 georeferenced · 194 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 354
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 30≤1 km 153≤10 km 181>10 km 39
403 georeferenced · 291 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence694
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions41 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
184
Bloomington, US
111
Saint Louis, US
105
Philadelphia, US
81
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
55
Bangkok, TH
29
Tuscaloosa, US
10
Bronx, US
10
Miami, US
7
Flagstaff, US
6
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
6
BAYLUlocation not on record
5
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
4
GB
4
Springfield, US
4
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
4
Tampa, US
3
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
3
AUAlocation not on record
3
Asheville, US
3
Richmond, US
3
Emporia, US
2
Maryland Department of Natural Resourceslocation not on record
2
College Park, US
2
Denver, US
2
Phoenix, US
2
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
2
EL PASO, US
2
Mississippi State, US
2
Chapel Hill, US
2
Jefferson City, US
1
Burlington, US
1
Kirksville, US
1
Dekalb, US
1
LINUlocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Knoxville, US
1
Chadron, US
1
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
1
Pittsburg, US
1
ASUlocation not on record
1
Taipei, TW
1
Fargo, US
1
Boise, US
1
Millersville, US
1
Austin, US
1
Norfolk, US
1
Northridge, US
1
Jackson, US
1
Madison, US
1
US
1
Fairfax, US
1
San Angelo, US
1
Tennessee Technological Universitylocation not on record
1
GAlocation not on record
1
Fayetteville, US
1
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
1
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
1
58 institutions · 686 of 694 vouchered records shown · 8 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Scutellaria incana was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
