Ripartites tricholoma, commonly known as the bearded seamine, is a species of fungus in the family Tricholomataceae. It was first described scientifically as Agaricus tricholoma by Albertini and Lewis David von Schweinitz in 1805, and later transferred into the genus Ripartites by Petter Karsten in 1879. It is found in North America and Europe, and has also been collected in Costa Rica.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ripartites tricholoma has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections45
Countries13
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualRipartites tricholoma carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈59 827 961 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Ripartites tricholoma0.06 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness95.2% BUSCO
07Deep time~23.9 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin23.9 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 948 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 238
Museum / vouchered696
Cultivated / captive1
Other13
Origin
Native5
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO7 480 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy26% within 1 km
≤100 m 283≤1 km 209≤10 km 1 342>10 km 74
1 908 georeferenced · 330 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 238
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy64% within 1 km
≤100 m 77≤1 km 137≤10 km 101>10 km 22
337 georeferenced · 359 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence696
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions32 of 63 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
53
Kew, GB
47
Copenhagen, DK
37
Uppsala, SE
24
Helsinki, FI
22
WU-MYClocation not on record
21
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
20
Karlsruhe, DE
17
Göteborg, SE
17
Trondheim, NO
16
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
16
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
13
LDlocation not on record
11
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
11
Bronx, US
10
Görlitz, DE
9
San Sebastián, ES
9
WTUlocation not on record
7
Tartu, EE
7
Philadelphia, US
7
TROMlocation not on record
7
St. Paul, US
6
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
6
Pullman, US
5
Joensuu, FI
5
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
5
BDBClocation not on record
5
GJOlocation not on record
5
Oulu, FI
4
nsnflocation not on record
4
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
4
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
4
Mlocation not on record
3
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
3
MAlocation not on record
3
Chicago, US
3
MeiseBGlocation not on record
3
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
3
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
3
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
3
Tilburg, NL
3
Zürich, CH
2
Kyiv, UA
2
Vitoria, ES
2
Turku, FI
2
Kuopio, FI
2
TENN-Flocation not on record
2
Salzburg, AT
2
Jyväskylä, FI
1
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Lausanne, CH
1
Toronto, CA
1
Berlin, DE
1
BRNUlocation not on record
1
CJBGlocation not on record
1
CA
1
Rene Pomerleau Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kewlocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
TUR-Alocation not on record
1
Denver, US
1
63 institutions · 490 of 696 vouchered records shown · 205 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA45 detections
Where the DNA of Ripartites tricholoma was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found45
Studies independent surveys5
Countries13
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 45 detections have coordinates
Open the map13 countries0
lÃ¥gurtgranskog (gran-bjørk)PalearcticNearcticAfrotropicung, plantet lÃ¥gurtgranskog (pÃ¥ noe løsma…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
pH4.80 4.70–4.90
Conductivity197 µS/cm 51.0–342
Organic carbon4.72 % 2.97–6.48
Nitrate-N69.0 mg/kg 11.0–127
Phosphorus342 mg/kg 284–400
Depth0.1 m 0–0.2
SoilFerrosol
2 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median11.5 °C -1.10–17.3
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.6 °C
Max temp (day)14.2 °C 1.40–20.7
Min temp (night)7.60 °C -5.60–13.6
Precipitation98.3 mm/mo 63.0–189
Air humidity62.9 % 58.0–65.6
Moisture balance10.9 mm/mo -18.2–86.8
Vapour deficit562 Pa 227–789
Wind speed2.90 m/s 2.10–6.60
Cloud cover43.9 % 30.4–61.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 44 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 948 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI45 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics7 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗