Rigidoporus ulmarius is a fungal plant pathogen found mainly on broad-leaved trees. Elm is considered particularly susceptible. The fruiting bodies are white, knobbly and relatively hard, requiring a fair amount of force to break. Older bodies may be covered with green algae, or partially covered with vegetation and leaves making them difficult to spot. They often encapsulate grass, twigs and other debris. Tubes are 1–5 mm long in each layer, pinkish to orange when young, browning with age, each layer separated by a thin contrasting band of white flesh. Pores 5–8 per millimeter, red-orange fading to clay-pink or buff with age. Spores pale yellow, globose, 6–7.5 µm in diameter. Hyphal structure monomitic; generative hyphae lacking clamps. Habitat at the base of trunks of deciduous trees, usually elm. Season all year, perennial. Common. Not edible. Found in Europe. A fruit body of R. ulmarius discovered in Kew Gardens of London in 2003 was, for a time, the largest known fungal fruit body ever discovered, measuring 150 by in diameter, and had a circumference of 425 cm. However, in 2011, a specimen of Phellinus ellipsoideus (formerly Fomitiporia ellipsoidea) significantly larger was discovered in China.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Rigidoporus ulmarius has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections4
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS9
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 023 records
Wild obs. + sensor614
Museum / vouchered409
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 324 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy13% within 1 km
≤100 m 35≤1 km 38≤10 km 476>10 km 35
584 georeferenced · 30 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor614
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy79% within 1 km
≤100 m 29≤1 km 21≤10 km 8>10 km 5
63 georeferenced · 346 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence409
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
143
Olocation not on record
34
Kew, GB
23
Durango, MX
22
Bronx, US
20
Mexico City, MX
15
UFPElocation not on record
15
Helsinki, FI
13
Schenectady, US
13
Chicago, US
8
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record
7
Tapachula, MX
7
Blumenau, BR
6
UFSClocation not on record
5
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
5
IPA/SPlocation not on record
5
MeiseBGlocation not on record
5
Córdoba, AR
5
Copenhagen, DK
4
Fungario QCAM de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadorlocation not on record
3
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
2
Beltsville, US
2
Tartu, EE
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Zapopan, MX
2
Museum of Zoologylocation not on record
2
Mlocation not on record
2
Denver, US
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
2
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
2
MAlocation not on record
2
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
2
Toronto, CA
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
Feira de Santana, BR
1
HabitatVisionlocation not on record
1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kewlocation not on record
1
Canberra, AU
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
1
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
1
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
San Nicolás de los Garza, MX
1
Córdoba, ES
1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
1
Görlitz, DE
1
49 institutions · 400 of 409 vouchered records shown · 9 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Rigidoporus ulmarius was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys3
Countries3
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
Afrotropic
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.8 °C 7.00–11.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter9.90 °C
Max temp (day)15.1 °C 9.30–15.4
Min temp (night)5.00 °C 4.00–6.90
Precipitation134 mm/mo 100–180
Air humidity65.6 % 61.4–67.0
Moisture balance62.4 mm/mo 13.2–86.5
Vapour deficit460 Pa 338–502
Wind speed1.50 m/s 1.20–5.60
Cloud cover41.0 % 35.8–67.6
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.