A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Rigidoporus lineatus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections3
Countries4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualRigidoporus lineatus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈46 923 322 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Rigidoporus lineatus0.05 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelScaffold
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type707 records
Wild obs. + sensor3
Museum / vouchered702
Cultivated / captive2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 012 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy33% within 1 km
≤1 km 1>10 km 2
3 georeferenced
Open the mapobservation + sensor3
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy26% within 1 km
≤100 m 24≤1 km 15≤10 km 89>10 km 21
149 georeferenced · 553 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence702
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 2 records without
Open the mapnot free-living2
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Blumenau, BR
152
UFPElocation not on record
142
IPA/SPlocation not on record
55
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record
52
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
46
Bronx, US
28
Olocation not on record
28
Chicago, US
27
Brisbane, AU
26
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
22
Santa Cruz, US
19
UFSClocation not on record
9
Canberra, AU
8
Auckland, NZ
7
Zapopan, MX
7
DPIlocation not on record
7
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
7
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
5
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
5
Tartu, EE
5
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
4
Mexico City, MX
3
Helsinki, FI
3
Baton Rouge, US
3
Kew, GB
2
Bando, JP
2
Museum of Zoologylocation not on record
2
FLASlocation not on record
2
WU-MYClocation not on record
2
Cincinnati, US
2
Tomioka, JP
2
Córdoba, AR
1
GJOlocation not on record
1
Feira de Santana, BR
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
TENN-Flocation not on record
1
JBRJlocation not on record
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
Kensington, AU
1
Copenhagen, DK
1
Osaka, JP
1
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
1
Chiba, JP
1
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
Toronto, CA
1
Mlocation not on record
1
49 institutions · 702 of 702 vouchered records shown
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Rigidoporus lineatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median23.8 °C 23.6–23.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter5.80 °C
Max temp (day)25.0 °C 24.4–28.5
Min temp (night)22.2 °C 19.9–22.6
Precipitation172 mm/mo 67.5–317
Air humidity63.4 % 60.9–73.3
Moisture balance50.3 mm/mo -50.6–154
Vapour deficit1,072 Pa 773–1,161
Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.70–5.30
Cloud cover23.5 % 21.8–34.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility707 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗