Rhynchosporium graminicola

Heinsen · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Ascomycota/Leotiomycetes/Helotiales/Ploettnerulaceae/Rhynchosporium

At a glance

Occurrence records13

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens0

eDNA detections14

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Rhynchosporium graminicola's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility13 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI14 eDNA detections↗

GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF13 records

Environmental DNA2 datasets · 0 countries14 detections

Genome at a glanceGoaT56 Mbp

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding14 eDNA hits

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Rhynchosporium graminicola has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

eDNA detections14

06Genome at a glanceGoaT

The complete instruction manual Rhynchosporium graminicola carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.

Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is

Genome size55 640 000 bp

Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).

BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb

FUNGUS0.04 Gb

THIS GENOME Rhynchosporium graminicola0.06 Gb

INSECT0.25 Gb

HUMAN3.2 Gb

WHEAT17 Gb

FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb

Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers

Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.

Assembly levelComplete Genome

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type13 records

Museum / vouchered12

Other1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO40 km²

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy29% within 1 km

≤1 km 2≤10 km 3>10 km 2

7 georeferenced · 5 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence12

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions4 of 5 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Pullman, US	4
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record	4
Madison, US	2
Kew, GB	1
Champaign, US	1

5 institutions · 12 of 12 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA14 detections

Where the DNA of Rhynchosporium graminicola was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found14

Studies independent surveys2

Verifiable raw sequence linked1

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 14 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)