Rhodocollybia butyracea, common name Buttery Collybia,Rhodocollybia butyraceaLocal: image viewer is a species of fungus in the mushroom family Marasmiaceae. It has a number of subspecies.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Rhodocollybia butyracea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens34
Marker genes3
eDNA detections229
Countries24
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS★ITS1★ITS2
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT
The complete instruction manualRhodocollybia butyracea carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈96 282 412 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Rhodocollybia butyracea0.10 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelContig
Completeness91.6% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type51 403 records
Wild obs. + sensor49 938
Museum / vouchered1 261
Cultivated / captive1
Other203
Origin
Native10
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO44 148 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy16% within 1 km
≤100 m 4 124≤1 km 2 861≤10 km 36 535>10 km 118
43 638 georeferenced · 6 300 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor49 938
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy69% within 1 km
≤100 m 84≤1 km 248≤10 km 132>10 km 19
483 georeferenced · 778 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 261
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions43 of 84 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
BDBClocation not on record
133
Olocation not on record
82
Joensuu, FI
75
TENN-Flocation not on record
60
Bronx, US
55
TROMlocation not on record
48
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
44
Helsinki, FI
42
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
40
San Sebastián, ES
28
Copenhagen, DK
23
Kyiv, UA
22
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
16
WTUlocation not on record
16
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
15
Toronto, CA
15
Denver, US
14
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
12
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
11
Kuopio, FI
11
Philadelphia, US
10
Vancouver, CA
10
Karlsruhe, DE
9
Görlitz, DE
8
TUR-Alocation not on record
8
Kensington, AU
8
Chicago, US
8
Durham, US
8
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
7
Brisbane, AU
6
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
6
LDlocation not on record
6
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
6
Turku, FI
6
WU-MYClocation not on record
6
Bardejov, SK
6
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
5
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
5
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
5
Kew, GB
5
Salzburg, AT
4
Staten Island, US
4
Jyväskylä, FI
4
Hobart, AU
4
Oulu, FI
4
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
3
Trondheim, NO
3
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
3
Tomioka, JP
3
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
3
Ciudad de México, MX
3
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
2
Royal Ontario Museum, TRTC Fungariumlocation not on record
2
Göteborg, SE
2
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
2
Mexico City, MX
2
Tartu, EE
2
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
2
Warsaw, PL
2
Paris, FR
1
Lausanne, CH
1
Rene Pomerleau Herbariumlocation not on record
1
PRMlocation not on record
1
UAclocation not on record
1
Zürich, CH
1
Norwegian Institute for Nature Researchlocation not on record
1
Research Collection of Joanne Schwartzlocation not on record
1
nsnflocation not on record
1
Osaka, JP
1
IPA/SPlocation not on record
1
St. Paul, US
1
NAlocation not on record
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
GJOlocation not on record
1
CA
1
Canberra, AU
1
Southeastern Louisiana University, Vertebrate Museumlocation not on record
1
Winterthur, CH
1
BRNUlocation not on record
1
NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record
1
Cincinnati, US
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Gijón, ES
1
Uppsala, SE
1
84 institutions · 979 of 1 261 vouchered records shown · 272 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA229 detections
Where the DNA of Rhodocollybia butyracea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found229
Studies independent surveys6
Countries24
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 229 detections have coordinates
Open the map24 countries0
Oak woodlandPalearcticNearcticOn needle litter under a big spruce in south…Rich deciduous forest on marine deposits, do…Aspen forest
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.2 °C 1.20–16.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.4 °C
Max temp (day)13.2 °C 4.40–19.9
Min temp (night)6.10 °C -1.40–12.6
Precipitation95.3 mm/mo 49.8–121
Air humidity62.2 % 60.3–66.5
Moisture balance17.1 mm/mo -38.4–80.2
Vapour deficit454 Pa 262–763
Wind speed3.10 m/s 1.80–5.50
Cloud cover58.5 % 38.4–63.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 217 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.