Rhizopogon vinicolor

A.H.Sm. · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Basidiomycota/Agaricomycetes/Boletales/Rhizopogonaceae/Rhizopogon

At a glance

Occurrence records97

Data sources9

Biological traits0

DNA specimens17

eDNA detections165

Sources9 archives

Databases and archives Rhizopogon vinicolor's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility97 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI165 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics17 specimens↗

NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF97 records

Environmental DNA5 datasets · 6 countries165 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD · NCBI17 specimens

Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI36 Mbp

01Narrative

Rhizopogon vinicolor is a species complex of ectomycorrhizal fungus which forms a mutualistic relationship with the Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga spp.). The species was first described scientifically by American mycologist Alexander H. Smith in 1966.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding17 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Rhizopogon vinicolor has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens17

Marker genes3

GenBank sequences10

eDNA detections165

Countries6

The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species

ITSFJ789621.1 ↗249 bpUSA

ACGT

GTTTTGAGGGAGGTNAAAAGTCGTTACCCAGGTTTTCCCGTCGGGGTACCCGNCGGGNGGGGTTCTTTANCGNATNTTCTTNCGTGGGGT …

Rhizopogon vinicolor voucher SOC1028 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P★ITS10★ITS1

animal barcodefungal barcode

06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI

The complete instruction manual Rhizopogon vinicolor carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.

Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is

Genome size35 685 000 bp

Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).

BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb

THIS GENOME Rhizopogon vinicolor0.04 Gb

FUNGUS0.04 Gb

INSECT0.25 Gb

HUMAN3.2 Gb

WHEAT17 Gb

FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb

Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers

Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.

Assembly levelScaffold

Completeness94.8% BUSCO

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type97 records

Wild obs. + sensor26

Museum / vouchered71

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO292 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy62% within 1 km

≤100 m 13≤1 km 3≤10 km 7>10 km 3

26 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor26

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy52% within 1 km

≤100 m 4≤1 km 7≤10 km 10

21 georeferenced · 50 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence71

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions4 of 13 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Ann Arbor, US	30
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record	6
Vancouver, CA	5
WTUlocation not on record	3
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record	2
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record	2
California State University, East Baylocation not on record	2
Canberra, AU	2
DPIlocation not on record	2
UAclocation not on record	1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record	1
Chicago, US	1
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record	1

13 institutions · 58 of 71 vouchered records shown · 13 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA165 detections

Where the DNA of Rhizopogon vinicolor was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found165

Studies independent surveys5

Countries6

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 165 detections have coordinates

Open the map6 countries0

river mouth [ENVO:00000386]NearcticForest

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median16.8 °C 10.8–19.5

Seasonal swing summer↔winter23.3 °C

Max temp (day)19.8 °C 15.6–27.4

Min temp (night)14.2 °C 7.60–14.2

Precipitation94.5 mm/mo 18.6–152

Air humidity61.4 % 55.1–64.9

Moisture balance3.70 mm/mo -119–70.2

Vapour deficit740 Pa 453–1,015

Wind speed2.30 m/s 1.50–2.90

Cloud cover43.7 % 31.5–43.7

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 151 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)