Rhizopogon roseolus is an ectomycorrhizal fungus used as a soil inoculant in agriculture and horticulture. It is considered a delicacy in east Asia and Japan where it is traditionally known as shoro. Techniques for the commercial cultivation of this fungus in pine plantations have been developed and applied with successful results in Japan and New Zealand.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Rhizopogon roseolus across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Rhizopogon roseolus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens80
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections223
Countries11
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualRhizopogon roseolus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size92 740 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Rhizopogon roseolus0.09 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelScaffold
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 245 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 135
Museum / vouchered935
Other175
Origin
Native52
Introduced1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 436 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy55% within 1 km
≤100 m 271≤1 km 179≤10 km 348>10 km 23
821 georeferenced · 314 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 135
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km
≤100 m 60≤1 km 142≤10 km 168>10 km 63
433 georeferenced · 502 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence935
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions37 of 68 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
BDBClocation not on record
181
Uppsala, SE
77
Oulu, FI
77
Tartu, EE
45
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
34
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
31
TFC Miclocation not on record
20
WU-MYClocation not on record
17
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
17
Copenhagen, DK
17
San Sebastián, ES
16
Kensington, AU
15
Olocation not on record
15
MAlocation not on record
14
Stockholm, SE
14
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
13
Bronx, US
11
Durham, US
10
GJOlocation not on record
10
TENN-Flocation not on record
10
Helsinki, FI
9
Toronto, CA
9
Chapel Hill, US
8
Karlsruhe, DE
8
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
8
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
7
Görlitz, DE
6
Canberra, AU
6
Denver, US
5
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
5
Philadelphia, US
5
Auckland, NZ
5
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
5
LDlocation not on record
5
Staten Island, US
5
Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record
5
CJBGlocation not on record
5
Blacksburg, US
4
Vitoria, ES
4
Mlocation not on record
4
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
4
Ann Arbor, US
3
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
2
Bando, JP
2
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
2
Osaka, JP
2
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
2
Kuopio, FI
2
Helsinki, FI
2
Córdoba, ES
2
Brisbane, AU
1
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Nortelocation not on record
1
Baton Rouge, US
1
Göteborg, SE
1
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
1
Hobart, AU
1
Herb. Agererlocation not on record
1
Zürich, CH
1
Chicago, US
1
California State University, East Baylocation not on record
1
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
1
UNINE:NEUlocation not on record
1
Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record
1
Turku, FI
1
Pullman, US
1
Department of Plant Resources, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratorieslocation not on record
1
Kew, GB
1
Champaign, US
1
68 institutions · 803 of 935 vouchered records shown · 79 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA223 detections
Where the DNA of Rhizopogon roseolus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found223
Studies independent surveys6
Countries11
Verifiable raw sequence linked2
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 223 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
kalklindeskog med lind, furu, brattlendt, sk…Forest
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
Temperature15.0 °C 10.8–20.2
pH5.50 4.00–9.00
Conductivity59.0 µS/cm 7.00–42,000
Salinity26.6 PSU
Dissolved oxygen8.64 mg/L
Turbidity3.01 NTU
Organic carbon2.87 % 0.01–5.84
Water content17.9 % 0.474–80.1
Nitrate-N8.00 mg/kg 0.5–50.0
Phosphorus18.0 mg/kg 2.00–193
Clay15.3 % 1.94–64.9
Sand69.2 % 22.9–97.1
Depth0 m 0–0.5
SoilCoastal waterTenosolKurosolPodosolDermosolSodosolLatLon out of range
108 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.9 °C 5.00–17.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter14.1 °C
Max temp (day)18.8 °C 9.10–23.2
Min temp (night)8.50 °C 1.00–14.4
Precipitation66.7 mm/mo 33.4–130
Air humidity61.1 % 52.9–64.2
Moisture balance-26.8 mm/mo -76.1–54.3
Vapour deficit690 Pa 311–953
Wind speed2.60 m/s 2.00–5.90
Cloud cover32.1 % 17.4–44.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 194 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.