Rhamnus prinoides, the shiny-leaf buckthorn, is an African shrub or small tree in the family Rhamnaceae. Commonly referred to as "gesho" it was first scientifically described by French botanist Charles Louis L'Héritier de Brutelle in 1789.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Rhamnus prinoides across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Rhamnus prinoides has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens10
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections6
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL3★rbcLa★ITS7
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~16.4 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin16.4 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 909 records
Wild obs. + sensor995
Museum / vouchered914
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 872 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy97% within 1 km
≤100 m 665≤1 km 64≤10 km 18>10 km 6
753 georeferenced · 242 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor995
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy69% within 1 km
≤100 m 2≤1 km 22≤10 km 7>10 km 4
35 georeferenced · 879 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence914
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions20 of 61 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Pretoria, ZA
395
Saint Louis, US
78
Kew, GB
46
MeiseBGlocation not on record
34
Durban, ZA
30
TAFORI-LSRClocation not on record
30
Yaoundé, CM
19
WAGlocation not on record
17
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
13
Cape Town, ZA
13
Embrapa Agrobiology Diazothrophic Microbial Culture Collectionlocation not on record
10
Bronx, US
9
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
9
MAlocation not on record
6
Clocation not on record
6
Arusha, TZ
5
Bloomington, US
5
Plocation not on record
5
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
4
Addis Ababa, ET
4
Zürich, CH
4
Berlin, DE
4
EAlocation not on record
3
Xiamen, CN
3
Southern Highlands Conservation Programmelocation not on record
3
MSB-3054location not on record
3
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
2
BRLUlocation not on record
2
University of Oxfordlocation not on record
2
DSMlocation not on record
2
South African National Biodiversity Institutelocation not on record
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Haramaya Universitylocation not on record
2
Uppsala, SE
2
Frankfurt am Main
2
Llocation not on record
1
Mlocation not on record
1
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Compton Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Auckland, NZ
1
University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record
1
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
1
NAlocation not on record
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
Limbe Botanical & Zoological Gardenslocation not on record
1
LGlocation not on record
1
TFDlocation not on record
1
CASlocation not on record
1
University of Johannesburg, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnologylocation not on record
1
University of Burundilocation not on record
1
University of Hamburglocation not on record
1
National Natural History Collectionslocation not on record
1
Glocation not on record
1
Helsinki, FI
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
LDlocation not on record
1
Université de Kisanganilocation not on record
1
GENTlocation not on record
1
Herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Tokyolocation not on record
1
Trondheim, NO
1
University of Johannesburglocation not on record
1
61 institutions · 803 of 914 vouchered records shown · 111 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Rhamnus prinoides was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.6 °C 12.2–14.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter8.60 °C
Max temp (day)18.6 °C 18.4–19.0
Min temp (night)6.70 °C 6.30–9.50
Precipitation20.8 mm/mo 15.6–80.2
Air humidity56.2 % 51.6–60.1
Moisture balance-46.6 mm/mo -61.7–-36.4
Vapour deficit636 Pa 619–703
Wind speed3.20 m/s 2.80–3.40
Cloud cover13.0 % 7.70–17.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.