The southern reedbuck, rietbok or common reedbuck (Redunca arundinum) is a diurnal antelope typically found in southern Africa. It was first described by Pieter Boddaert, a Dutch physician and naturalist, in 1785. It is placed in the genus Redunca and family Bovidae. This antelope has an average mass of 58 kg and a body length of about 134 -.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
⚠ sources differ — PanTHERIA: 274 days · AnAge: 376 days · AmnioteDB: 325 days
Population density0.65 /km²
05DNA & barcoding12 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Redunca arundinum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens12
BINs1
Marker genes11
eDNA detections2
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5PCOIICOXIIICYTBND1ND2ND3ND4ND4LND5-0ND6
animal barcodemitochondrial
07Deep time5.33–0 Ma
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
Fossil range5.33–0 Ma Pliocene, Pleistocene, Holocene
Dated fossil finds27
Most finds around1.25 Ma 14 finds · Pleistocene
DNA clock origin4.48 Ma TimeTree
StatusExtinct no longer alive anywhere
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The solid bar is the fossil range: the span between the oldest and the youngest fossil that palaeontologists have assigned to Redunca arundinum. Above itBeside it, the bars count how many dated finds fall in each slice of time; the tallest bar is labelled, and heights use a square-root scale so that thin slices stay visible next to rich ones. Read this as how well each stretch of time is preserved and studied — thick bars mean plenty of the right kind of rock and plenty of collectors, which is related to, but not the same as, how common it actually was. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
fossil range (PBDB) †dated finds per sliceDNA clock origin
The two clocks disagree here. The fossil record reaches back to 5.33 Ma, but the molecular clock dates the lineage to only 4.48 Ma — about 0.85 Myr younger. A fossil cannot be older than the lineage it belongs to, so one of the two is off: either the fossil is assigned to the wrong species, or the clock is running fast.
Extinct — but the bar still reaches today. PBDB flags this lineage as extinct, yet its fossil range ends at 0 Ma — the present day. Both cannot be literally true. This is what it looks like when the youngest fossils fall inside the most recent slice of the time scale: the endpoint rounds to “today” rather than to the actual disappearance, which may be far too recent for an axis measured in millions of years to resolve. Read the young end of the bar (and the †) as the limit of the dated record, not as the date it died out.
How it livedPBDB
Environmentterrestrial
Life habitground dwelling
Dietgrazer, browser
Motilityactively mobile
Compositionhydroxyapatite
Reproductionviviparous
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 732 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 221
Museum / vouchered116
Fossil56
Other339
Origin
Native3
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 396 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy75% within 1 km
≤100 m 400≤1 km 261≤10 km 128>10 km 90
879 georeferenced · 342 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 221
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy31% within 1 km
≤100 m 8≤1 km 12≤10 km 19>10 km 26
65 georeferenced · 51 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence116
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions12 of 16 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Cambridge, US
23
Chicago, US
9
Denver, US
9
Washington, US
9
Geneva, CH
8
NHMOlocation not on record
6
Wuzhou, CN
4
Helsinki, FI
4
Brussels, BE
4
Bonn, DE
3
Los Angeles, US
3
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
3
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record
2
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
2
Seattle, US
1
Saint John, CA
1
16 institutions · 91 of 116 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Redunca arundinum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.