Puccinia dioicae is a plant pathogen that causes rust on goldenrod. It is common in Iceland, where it infects Taraxacum species and Carex capillaris where pycniospores and aeciospores are found on Taraxacum sp. and uredospores and teliospores are found on Carex capillaris.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Puccinia dioicae has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens19
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections5
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Puccinia dioicae var. micropuncta TSH:R25983 genes for 5.8S rRNA, ITS2, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS2
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 520 records
Wild obs. + sensor353
Museum / vouchered2 142
Other25
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 272 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy19% within 1 km
≤100 m 50≤1 km 8≤10 km 250>10 km 5
313 georeferenced · 40 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor353
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy10% within 1 km
≤100 m 17≤1 km 131≤10 km 1 128>10 km 273
1 549 georeferenced · 593 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 142
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 47 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Madison, US
936
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
233
DPIlocation not on record
158
ILLSlocation not on record
83
Pullman, US
82
Uppsala, SE
76
Helsinki, FI
71
Karlsruhe, DE
68
LDlocation not on record
66
St. Paul, US
37
Görlitz, DE
27
Bronx, US
27
Tartu, EE
25
Laramie, US
24
TENN-Flocation not on record
24
TROMlocation not on record
19
Mlocation not on record
19
CA
19
Chicago, US
17
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
15
Kuopio, FI
14
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
12
WU-MYClocation not on record
10
Durham, US
8
PHlocation not on record
8
Stockholm, SE
7
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
7
Kew, GB
4
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
3
Olocation not on record
3
Chapel Hill, US
3
Champaign, US
3
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
3
GJOlocation not on record
3
Toronto, CA
3
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
2
Zürich, CH
2
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
2
Berlin, DE
2
Universität Tübingenlocation not on record
2
Auckland, NZ
2
San Sebastián, ES
1
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiejlocation not on record
1
UNINE:NEUlocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
Bando, JP
1
47 institutions · 2 135 of 2 142 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Puccinia dioicae was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 520 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics19 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗