Psychotria marginata adalah spesies tumbuhan yang tergolong ke dalam famili Rubiaceae. Spesies ini juga merupakan bagian dari ordo Gentianales. Spesies Psychotria marginata sendiri merupakan bagian dari genus Psychotria. Nama ilmiah dari spesies ini pertama kali diterbitkan oleh Sw..
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Habitat GIFTCampo de Várzea, Floresta de Igapó, Floresta de Terra Firme, Floresta de Várzea
Woodinesswoody
Physiology & chemistry7
Ldmc max348 mg/g
Ldmc min348 mg/g
Leaf dry-matter content (LDMC)272 mg/g
⚠ sources differ — TRY: 272 mg/g · GIFT: 348 mg/g
Leaf n14.8 mg/g
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Specific leaf area (SLA)16.59 mm²/mg
Wood density295 mg/cm³
05DNA & barcoding1 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Psychotria marginata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens1
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences8
eDNA detections1
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL1★ITS5
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 666 records
Wild obs. + sensor159
Museum / vouchered1 506
Other1
Origin
Native4
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 852 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 49≤1 km 15≤10 km 5>10 km 1
70 georeferenced · 89 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor159
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy72% within 1 km
≤100 m 115≤1 km 16≤10 km 34>10 km 17
182 georeferenced · 1 324 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 506
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions43 of 84 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
615
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
147
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
100
Mexico City, MX
84
Durango, MX
53
Durham, US
38
Bronx, US
27
León, NI
25
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
25
Chicago, US
25
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
24
San José, CR
22
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
20
MEXUlocation not on record
19
Tapachula, MX
16
Kew, GB
14
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
13
Mexico City, MX
11
Xiamen, CN
10
La Paz, BO
9
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
7
Logan, US
7
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
7
South Kensington, GB
6
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
6
Austin, US
6
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (UPTC)location not on record
6
Stockholm, SE
5
Minister of Sustainable Development, Climate Change & Solid Waste Managementlocation not on record
5
Mérida, MX
5
Jardín Botánico de Cartagena "Guillermo Piñeres" (JBC)location not on record
5
QCNElocation not on record
5
San Diego, US
4
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
4
ASUlocation not on record
4
Aarhus, DK
4
HUAlocation not on record
4
Corrientes, AR
3
Göteborg, SE
3
Claremont, US
3
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)location not on record
3
MeiseBGlocation not on record
3
Cochabamba, BO
3
BMlocation not on record
3
LDlocation not on record
2
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
2
OTSlocation not on record
2
Edinburgh, GB
2
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
2
Berlin, DE
2
Loja, EC
2
arosemena tola, EC
2
Davis, US
2
MAlocation not on record
2
Riverside, US
2
Guatemala City, GT
2
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
2
Corporación Autónoma Regional Para la Defensa de la Meseta de Bucaramanga (CDMB)location not on record
2
JBRJlocation not on record
2
Cambridge, US
1
Austin, US
1
Gotland Universitylocation not on record
1
Riobamba, EC
1
Managua, NI
1
Madison, US
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
Fundación Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe de Medellínlocation not on record
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Departamento de Sistematica e Ecologialocation not on record
1
Iquitos, PE
1
CJBGlocation not on record
1
IPA/SPlocation not on record
1
Miami, US
1
Chapingo, MX
1
Embrapa Agrobiology Diazothrophic Microbial Culture Collectionlocation not on record
1
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
1
Universiti Sains Malaysialocation not on record
1
MODlocation not on record
1
QAPlocation not on record
1
Cusco, PE
1
Sangmiung Universitylocation not on record
1
Juriquilla, MX
1
Mlocation not on record
1
Herbario Selva Central Oxapampa - estación biológica del Jardín Botánico de Missourilocation not on record
1
84 institutions · 1 463 of 1 506 vouchered records shown · 43 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Psychotria marginata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.