⚠ sources differ — GIFT: herb · TRY: Forb/herb, Subshrub
Woodinessnon-woody
05DNA & barcoding3 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Pseudognaphalium biolettii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes3
eDNA detections1
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcLa★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 621 records
Wild obs. + sensor4 417
Museum / vouchered1 204
Origin
Native6
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO7 180 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy95% within 1 km
≤100 m 3 004≤1 km 316≤10 km 100>10 km 68
3 488 georeferenced · 929 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 417
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy75% within 1 km
≤100 m 116≤1 km 285≤10 km 125>10 km 6
532 georeferenced · 672 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 204
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions32 of 40 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
San Diego, US
355
Santa Barbara, US
243
Riverside, US
175
Claremont, US
60
US
46
San Luis Obispo, US
44
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
39
Los Angeles, US
21
Davis, US
15
CASlocation not on record
14
Long Beach, US
13
Irvine, US
12
La Paz, MX
11
Catalina Island Conservancylocation not on record
10
Mexico City, MX
8
Northridge, US
8
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
8
Arcata, US
7
Phoenix, US
5
Santa Cruz, US
4
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
4
San Jose, US
3
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
3
Calabar, NG
3
Dekalb, US
2
Chadron, US
2
Columbia, US
1
Fort Worth, US
1
Logan, US
1
Henderson, US
1
Pullman, US
1
Provo, US
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Austin, US
1
Brookings, US
1
Cambridge, US
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
ASUlocation not on record
1
San Diego Natural History Museum, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Fullerton, US
1
40 institutions · 1 129 of 1 204 vouchered records shown · 75 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Pseudognaphalium biolettii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.2 °C 14.2–14.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter8.10 °C
Max temp (day)17.7 °C
Min temp (night)10.6 °C
Precipitation49.1 mm/mo
Air humidity62.1 %
Moisture balance-47.5 mm/mo
Vapour deficit613 Pa
Wind speed1.70 m/s
Cloud cover36.3 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility5 621 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗