A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Pouzolzia zeylanica has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens9
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections8
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK3★rbcL4★rbcLa★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualPouzolzia zeylanica carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 989≤1 km 132≤10 km 61>10 km 54
1 236 georeferenced · 650 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 886
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy55% within 1 km
≤100 m 76≤1 km 32≤10 km 61>10 km 26
195 georeferenced · 687 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence882
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions54 of 80 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Beijing, CN
75
Brisbane, AU
60
Guangzhou, CN
55
Taipei, TW
55
Kunming, CN
48
Nishihara, JP
35
TAIElocation not on record
28
Tampa, US
25
Taipei, TW
25
Smithfield, AU
25
Canberra, AU
21
Palmerston, AU
19
Kew, GB
17
Guilin, CN
16
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
16
Kensington, AU
15
Odawara, JP
15
Taipei, TW
14
Bronx, US
13
Miami, US
12
Tsukuba, JP
12
Mount Annan, AU
11
Hunan Hupingshan National Nature Reservelocation not on record
10
Saint Louis, US
10
CASlocation not on record
8
Chengdu, CN
7
Guangzhou, CN
7
Yangling, CN
7
Hangzhou, CN
7
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
6
Nishihara, JP
6
Seoul, KR
6
Institute for Agricultural Bacteriology and Fermentation Biologylocation not on record
5
Guangxi Institute of Traditional Medical and Pharmaceutical Scienceslocation not on record
5
Baroda, IN
5
Xiamen, CN
4
Nanjing, CN
4
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
4
South Kensington, GB
4
Edinburgh, GB
4
Changsha, CN
3
Berlin, DE
3
Cambridge, US
3
Nagasaki University - Fisherieslocation not on record
3
Siouxland Heritage Museumlocation not on record
3
Museo universitario di Chietilocation not on record
3
Hanshan Normal Universitylocation not on record
2
Herbarium of South China Botanical Gardenlocation not on record
2
Nagano City, JP
2
Kagoshima, JP
2
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
2
Shanghai, CN
2
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
2
Lanzhou, CN
2
Zhejiang Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
2
Vancouver, CA
2
Wuhan, CN
2
Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan Universitylocation not on record
2
Hobart, AU
1
Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV
1
Minia, EG
1
Sanda, JP
1
Bloomington, US
1
Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Gardenlocation not on record
1
Chadron, US
1
Chiba, JP
1
Australian Tropical Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Pondicherry, IN
1
Peking Universitylocation not on record
1
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST)location not on record
1
Zhejiang Universitylocation not on record
1
Christchurch, NZ
1
Jishou Universitylocation not on record
1
Servico de Microbiologia e Imunologialocation not on record
1
Gujarat Biodiversity Gene Banklocation not on record
1
Yunnan Universitylocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Fort Worth, US
1
EL PASO, US
1
Cincinnati, US
1
80 institutions · 785 of 882 vouchered records shown · 96 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA8 detections
Where the DNA of Pouzolzia zeylanica was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found8
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 8 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
Irrigation ditches near farmlandsGrassland
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median20.9 °C 18.3–23.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter14.2 °C
Max temp (day)26.2 °C 22.0–28.1
Min temp (night)15.2 °C 14.7–18.3
Precipitation73.6 mm/mo 7.40–252
Air humidity63.0 % 44.9–67.8
Moisture balance-24.7 mm/mo -124–137
Vapour deficit896 Pa 752–1,495
Wind speed2.10 m/s 1.50–3.90
Cloud cover31.2 % 14.1–56.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.