Chrząstkowiec polny, chrząstkowiec pospolity – gatunek roślin zielnych należący do rodziny w różnych systemach klasyfikacyjnych do rodziny komosowatych lub szarłatowatych. Występuje w Europie oraz na obszarach Azji o umiarkowanym klimacie. W Polsce rośnie na nizinach.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
⚠ sources differ — GIFT: 0.175 m · LEDA: 0.175 m · TRY: 0.192 m
Plant height generative0.175 m
Plant height max0.3 m
Plant height min0.03 m
Seed length1.25 mm
Seed mass0.388 mg
Life cycle & reproduction12
Deciduousnessaestival
Dehiscenceindehiscent
Dispersal typewind
Flowering endSep
Flowering startJul
Life formannual
Life spanannual
Lifespan years1 years
Pollination modeabiotic
Pollination syndromewind
Raunkiær life formtherophyte
Self fertilizationabsent
Diet & foraging2
Carnivorynon-carnivorous
Parasiteindependent
Habitat & environment8
Aquaticterrestrial
Climatetemperate
Climberself-supporting
Epiphyteterrestrial
Fruit typeachene
Growth formherb
Habitat GIFTforest, old fields, sand, steppe, stony places
Woodinessnon-woody
Physiology & chemistry5
Leaf dry-matter content (LDMC)453 mg/g
Leaf n7.54 mg/g
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Seed longevity index0.75
Specific leaf area (SLA)8.9 mm²/mg
Other traits1
Diaspore typegerminule
05DNA & barcoding3 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Polycnemum arvense has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences5
eDNA detections1
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL3★rbcLa★ITS1
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualPolycnemum arvense carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Jav|0urková-Jarolímová, V. 1992. In J. M|3esí|3ccek & V. Jav@0urková-Jarolímová, List of Chromosome Numbers of the Czech Vascular Plants. Academia, Praha.
CCDB · eflora
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Javurková-Jarolímová, V. (1992). List of Chromosome Numbers of the Czech Vascular Plants. In J. Mesíccek & V. Javurková-Jarolímová. Academia, Praha Praha
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — M?sí?ek J. et Jarolímová-Jav?rková V. (1992). List of chromosome numbers of the Czech vascular plants. Academia, Praha. p. 1-144.
CCDB · slov-fl — Májovský J. et al., 1974b: Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora Part 4. - Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comen., Bot. 23: 1-23.
CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 — MAJOVSKY, J., ET AL. 1974. Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian Flora. (Part 4). Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae Bot. 23: 1-23.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Castroviejo & al. (2003). Flora Iberica (vol. I-VIII, X, XIV) Publicaciones del CSIC Madrid
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy12% within 1 km
≤100 m 219≤1 km 180≤10 km 2 753>10 km 191
3 343 georeferenced · 531 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 874
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy44% within 1 km
≤100 m 50≤1 km 104≤10 km 187>10 km 10
351 georeferenced · 365 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence716
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions31 of 72 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
BIO-UNIPIlocation not on record
89
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
75
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
71
BRNUlocation not on record
50
BFLlocation not on record
30
Wlocation not on record
22
LDlocation not on record
20
València, ES
18
Bern, CH
17
MAlocation not on record
16
Zürich, CH
15
Mlocation not on record
15
CJBGlocation not on record
14
Görlitz, DE
13
BDBClocation not on record
11
GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record
10
Zürich, CH
10
Naturhistorische Gesellschaft Nürnberg e.V.location not on record
10
Oskarshamn, SE
9
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
8
BClocation not on record
7
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
6
Berlin, DE
5
Salamanca, ES
5
PRClocation not on record
5
GZUlocation not on record
4
MeiseBGlocation not on record
4
Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisienlocation not on record
3
Granada, ES
3
Barcelona, ES
3
Wellington, NZ
3
Madrid, ES
3
Bourges, FR
3
Vancouver, CA
2
Regensburgische Botanische Gesellschaftlocation not on record
2
GJOlocation not on record
2
UGentlocation not on record
2
Paris, FR
2
ISAlocation not on record
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
BG-NMNHSlocation not on record
2
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
2
Universität Basel, Herbariumlocation not on record
2
Banyoles, ES
1
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
1
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsinlocation not on record
1
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Helsinki, FI
1
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record
1
ER Hellerlocation not on record
1
Universidad del Pais Vasco (UPV/EHU)location not on record
1
Bloomington, US
1
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
1
Fribourg, CH
1
Vitoria, ES
1
Porrentruy, CH
1
IPE-CSIClocation not on record
1
Salvador, BR
1
Beijing, CN
1
LfUlocation not on record
1
Madrid, ES
1
Podgorica, ME
1
Alicante, ES
1
Jaén, ES
1
Dresden, DE
1
Gijón, ES
1
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Karlsruhe (State Museum of Natural History)location not on record
1
Pamplona, ES
1
FLADlocation not on record
1
72 institutions · 626 of 716 vouchered records shown · 90 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Polycnemum arvense was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.8 °C 14.8–14.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.4 °C
Max temp (day)20.4 °C
Min temp (night)9.10 °C
Precipitation49.3 mm/mo
Air humidity54.1 %
Moisture balance-84.1 mm/mo
Vapour deficit774 Pa
Wind speed2.60 m/s
Cloud cover38.5 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.