Habitat GIFTFloresta de Várzea, Floresta Ombrófila (= Floresta Pluvial)
Woodinesswoody
Physiology & chemistry8
Leaf C:N ratio29.03 g/g
Leaf c516 mg/g
Leaf dry-matter content (LDMC)420 mg/g
Leaf n15.01 mg/g
Leaf p1.22 mg/g
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Specific leaf area (SLA)13.6 mm²/mg
Wood density680 mg/cm³
05DNA & barcoding9 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Pleuranthodendron lindenii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens9
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences7
eDNA detections5
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Pleuranthodendron lindenii voucher Pedro Acevedo 16052 (MEXU, US) ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK3★rbcL4★rbcLa★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~9.63 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin9.63 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 443 records
Wild obs. + sensor66
Museum / vouchered1 377
Origin
Native24
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 200 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy88% within 1 km
≤100 m 33≤1 km 5≤10 km 3>10 km 2
43 georeferenced · 23 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor66
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy94% within 1 km
≤100 m 408≤1 km 10≤10 km 23>10 km 6
447 georeferenced · 930 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 377
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions39 of 87 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
328
Durango, MX
252
Mexico City, MX
156
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
65
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
50
Kew, GB
39
QCNElocation not on record
35
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
28
Chapingo, MX
25
Bronx, US
24
San Francisco, US
23
Austin, US
22
Tapachula, MX
21
Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record
19
Mérida, MX
17
Chicago, US
13
San José, CR
11
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
11
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
11
Loja, EC
10
Austin, US
10
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
9
MEXUlocation not on record
9
Aarhus, DK
8
Durham, US
8
Juriquilla, MX
7
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
7
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
7
CASlocation not on record
7
Xiamen, CN
6
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
5
Quito, EC
5
arosemena tola, EC
5
Puebla, MX
4
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
4
Herbario Selva Central Oxapampa - estación biológica del Jardín Botánico de Missourilocation not on record
4
Minister of Sustainable Development, Climate Change & Solid Waste Managementlocation not on record
4
UEPAlocation not on record
4
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
4
Edinburgh, GB
3
OTSlocation not on record
3
HUAlocation not on record
3
ASUlocation not on record
3
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
3
San Francisco de Campeche, MX
3
Universiti Sains Malaysialocation not on record
3
León, NI
3
Area de Conservacion Guanacastelocation not on record
2
HUT Culture Collectionlocation not on record
2
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Ministry of Agriculturelocation not on record
2
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
2
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
2
JBRJlocation not on record
2
Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas - SINCHIlocation not on record
2
Fundación Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe de Medellínlocation not on record
2
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
2
Davis, US
2
BMlocation not on record
1
San Diego, US
1
Dekalb, US
1
Tampa, US
1
Guasave, MX
1
QAPlocation not on record
1
Guatemala City, GT
1
Cambridge, US
1
Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, (CSIC-UPF)location not on record
1
Río Palenque Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Elocation not on record
1
GB
1
Station d'Ecologie de Lamtolocation not on record
1
Herbario de la Universidad Técnica del Nortelocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
HEMlocation not on record
1
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
1
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
1
University of California at Berkeleylocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
CJBGlocation not on record
1
Kunming, CN
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Instituto para la Investigación y la Preservación del Patrimonio Cultural y Natural del Valle del Cauca - INCIVAlocation not on record
1
UTPLlocation not on record
1
Calabar, NG
1
UFMGlocation not on record
1
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad del Ecuadorlocation not on record
1
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)location not on record
1
Montecillo, Texcoco, MX
1
87 institutions · 1 351 of 1 377 vouchered records shown · 26 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Pleuranthodendron lindenii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median24.4 °C 23.2–26.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter4.00 °C
Max temp (day)28.2 °C 26.9–29.6
Min temp (night)21.1 °C 20.2–22.7
Precipitation67.2 mm/mo 58.6–94.4
Air humidity64.0 % 61.7–65.5
Moisture balance-96.2 mm/mo -102–-78.9
Vapour deficit1,061 Pa 1,051–1,241
Wind speed2.10 m/s 2.00–2.50
Cloud cover17.9 % 13.6–25.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.