Compounds documented for Plagiogyria adnata across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile1 class
Iridoids monoterpenoids1
Documented compounds1 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
Plagiogyrin A
present
LOTUS
05DNA & barcoding4 sequences
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Plagiogyria adnata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences4
eDNA detections3
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcL4
plant barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualPlagiogyria adnata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 2602×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · eflora
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Nakato, N. 1988. Notes on chromosomes of Japanese pteridophytes (2). J. Jap. Bot. 63: 214–218.
CCDB · eflora
07Deep time~2.58 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin2.58 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 404 records
Wild obs. + sensor122
Museum / vouchered1 282
Origin
Native2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 368 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy64% within 1 km
≤100 m 44≤1 km 10≤10 km 20>10 km 10
84 georeferenced · 38 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor122
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy52% within 1 km
≤1 km 23≤10 km 21
44 georeferenced · 1 238 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 282
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions36 of 46 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Tsukuba, JP
662
Beijing, CN
126
Odawara, JP
96
Kochi, JP
60
Sendai, JP
51
Taipei, TW
44
Nagano City, JP
34
Guangzhou, CN
23
Saint Louis, US
21
Osaka, JP
21
Nishihara, JP
20
South Kensington, GB
18
Sanda, JP
13
Kew, GB
9
KOMlocation not on record
9
Paris, FR
9
Tokushima, JP
6
Yunnan Universitylocation not on record
5
Bronx, US
3
Chicago, US
3
Bando, JP
3
Kunming, CN
3
Zhuzhou, CN
3
Shanghai, CN
2
TAIElocation not on record
2
Toyama, JP
2
Nanjing, CN
2
Shenzhen, CN
2
Wuhan, CN
2
Nishihara, JP
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
Chiba, JP
1
Xiamen, CN
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Guiyang, CN
1
Seoul, KR
1
Berlin, DE
1
FJFClocation not on record
1
Guilin, CN
1
Xiangtan City, CN
1
UFPRlocation not on record
1
Nanchong, CN
1
Ischia Marine Centrelocation not on record
1
Jiangxi Universitylocation not on record
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Omachi Alpine Museumlocation not on record
1
46 institutions · 1 273 of 1 282 vouchered records shown · 8 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Plagiogyria adnata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median7.40 °C 7.40–7.40
Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.4 °C
Max temp (day)9.60 °C
Min temp (night)3.00 °C
Precipitation344 mm/mo
Air humidity64.9 %
Moisture balance263 mm/mo
Vapour deficit428 Pa
Wind speed2.90 m/s
Cloud cover44.6 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.