Phyllactinia guttata is a species of fungus in the family Erysiphaceae; the anamorph of this species is Ovulariopsis moricola. A plant pathogen distributed in temperate regions, P. guttata causes a powdery mildew on leaves and stems on a broad range of host plants; many records of infection are from Corylus species, like filbert (Corylus maxima) and hazel (Corylus avellana). Once thought to be conspecific with Phyllactinia chorisiae, a 1997 study proved that they are in fact separate species. Microscopically, P. guttata is characterized by large ascomata, long narrow pointed appendages with bulbous swellings at base, 2- or 3-spored asci with large ascospores; the ascomata also have gelatinous cells with tufts of hyphae somewhat resembling hairs. The cleistothecia are capable of dissemination and attachment to new growing surfaces by means of gelatinous penicillate cells.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Phyllactinia guttata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens62
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections72
Countries9
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 081 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 505
Museum / vouchered1 524
Other52
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO7 172 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy33% within 1 km
≤100 m 363≤1 km 94≤10 km 931>10 km 15
1 403 georeferenced · 102 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 505
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km
≤100 m 26≤1 km 289≤10 km 295>10 km 55
665 georeferenced · 859 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 524
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions30 of 61 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Mlocation not on record
241
Görlitz, DE
119
Olocation not on record
104
Champaign, US
94
Bronx, US
84
TROMlocation not on record
72
Helsinki, FI
69
DPIlocation not on record
57
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
44
LDlocation not on record
41
Karlsruhe, DE
39
Uppsala, SE
37
Tartu, EE
36
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
27
ILLSlocation not on record
27
Pullman, US
17
Chapel Hill, US
17
PHlocation not on record
15
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
14
WU-MYClocation not on record
13
Kew, GB
8
Baton Rouge, US
7
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
7
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
7
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
6
MAlocation not on record
6
Copenhagen, DK
6
Madison, US
5
CA
5
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
5
Trondheim, NO
4
Lincoln, US
4
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
4
Brown Universitylocation not on record
3
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Researchlocation not on record
3
MeiseBGlocation not on record
3
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
3
BDBClocation not on record
3
Laramie, US
3
Chicago, US
3
Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record
2
nsnflocation not on record
2
Zürich, CH
2
Logan, US
2
WTUlocation not on record
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
Vancouver, CA
2
GJOlocation not on record
2
Canberra, AU
2
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
St. Paul, US
1
Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistanlocation not on record
1
Bourges, FR
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Minia, EG
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Gijón, ES
1
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
1
61 institutions · 1 292 of 1 524 vouchered records shown · 176 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA72 detections
Where the DNA of Phyllactinia guttata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found72
Studies independent surveys4
Countries9
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 72 detections have coordinates
Open the map9 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median7.40 °C 7.40–19.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.4 °C
Max temp (day)9.60 °C 9.60–24.2
Min temp (night)3.00 °C 3.00–13.9
Precipitation344 mm/mo 52.5–344
Air humidity64.9 % 56.3–64.9
Moisture balance263 mm/mo -25.3–263
Vapour deficit428 Pa 428–990
Wind speed2.90 m/s 2.50–4.20
Cloud cover44.6 % 34.9–47.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 66 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.