A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Phycodrys rubens has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens71
BINs1
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections321
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
EuropeN.America
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★rbcL7★ITS328S28S-D2
animal barcodeplant barcodefungal barcodemarker
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type29 752 records
Wild obs. + sensor5 707
Museum / vouchered14 634
Other9 411
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO14 416 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit11 779
200–1000 m twilight0
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 10.7 m · max 63 m · 11 779 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy98% within 1 km
≤100 m 5 141≤1 km 201≤10 km 83>10 km 3
5 428 georeferenced · 279 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor5 707
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy89% within 1 km
≤100 m 192≤1 km 3 274≤10 km 394>10 km 53
3 913 georeferenced · 10 721 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence14 634
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions34 of 66 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Clocation not on record
2 242
730location not on record
2 088
Durham, US
1 227
LDlocation not on record
157
Ann Arbor, US
114
South Kensington, GB
101
KMNlocation not on record
71
Chapel Hill, US
66
TROMlocation not on record
46
Bronx, US
43
DASSHlocation not on record
32
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
32
Durham, US
26
PNHSlocation not on record
21
Trondheim, NO
21
Tampa, US
20
Butler Universitylocation not on record
19
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
16
Stockholm, SE
15
MeiseBGlocation not on record
14
Burlington, US
12
GRAlocation not on record
9
9
Minia, EG
9
Museum national d'Histoire naturellelocation not on record
8
Davis, US
7
BISHlocation not on record
7
Honolulu, US
7
Göteborg, SE
6
WTUlocation not on record
6
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
5
Stockholm, SE
3
Institut Francais pour l'Etude de la Merlocation not on record
3
Uppsala, SE
3
Vancouver, CA
3
Champaign, US
3
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
2
Universidad de Oviedolocation not on record
2
Madrid, ES
2
ARMS-MBONlocation not on record
2
Oskarshamn, SE
2
CEFASlocation not on record
2
Columbia, US
2
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
2
PHlocation not on record
2
San Diego, US
2
Edmonton, CA
2
nbflocation not on record
2
Arcata, US
2
New Haven, US
2
Musée des Confluenceslocation not on record
1
486location not on record
1
Tromsø, NO
1
Albany, US
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Porvoo, FI
1
Senckenberg Institute for Plant Form and Function at Friedrich Schiller University Jenalocation not on record
1
Corvallis, US
1
Barcelona, ES
1
Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschunglocation not on record
1
Bourges, FR
1
Marine Biological Association of the UKlocation not on record
1
Brown Universitylocation not on record
1
JBRJlocation not on record
1
Helsinki, FI
1
66 institutions · 6 515 of 14 634 vouchered records shown · 2 748 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA321 detections
Where the DNA of Phycodrys rubens was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found321
Studies independent surveys7
Countries9
Verifiable raw sequence linked17
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
Temperature20.3 °C 12.2–27.5
pH8.12 7.04–8.59
Conductivity49,768 µS/cm 33,100–53,500
Salinity35.8 PSU 22.0–39.7
Dissolved oxygen7.17 mg/L 5.47–10.5
Turbidity0.151 NTU 0.03–1.29
Nitrate0.467 µmol/L 0.1–5.11
Sand98.4 % 98.4–99.9
Depth2.00 m 0–47.0
Coastal watersea water (ENVO:00002149)PelagicSediment
177 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.5 °C 5.10–21.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter9.60 °C
Max temp (day)17.9 °C 7.50–23.7
Min temp (night)12.4 °C 3.70–19.7
Precipitation87.6 mm/mo 20.1–138
Air humidity59.4 % 55.1–64.9
Moisture balance43.3 mm/mo
Vapour deficit736 Pa 339–1,145
Wind speed6.10 m/s
Cloud cover25.7 % 10.6–51.1
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 320 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.