Compounds documented for Phoma rabiei across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Phoma rabiei has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
eDNA detections122
Countries6
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 records
Museum / vouchered1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 km²
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
>10 km 1
1 georeferenced
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1
10Collections & institutions
Institution
Specimens
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
1
1 institutions · 1 of 1 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA122 detections
Where the DNA of Phoma rabiei was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found122
Studies independent surveys7
Countries6
Verifiable raw sequence linked2
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 122 detections have coordinates
Open the map6 countries0
Cicer arietinumPalearctic
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
Temperature15.5 °C 9.00–28.0
pH6.50 4.00–9.10
Conductivity82.0 µS/cm 15.0–231
Organic carbon2.67 % 0.11–5.51
Water content9.09 % 2.40–27.0
Nitrate-N9.00 mg/kg 0.5–73.0
Phosphorus30.5 mg/kg 3.00–225
Clay14.9 % 4.20–53.2
Sand73.5 % 27.6–89.0
Depth0 m 0–0.2
MarineSoilSodosolChromosolsFerrosolKandosolLatLon out of rangeTenosols
102 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.8 °C 11.8–17.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.4 °C
Max temp (day)19.4 °C 15.8–22.4
Min temp (night)8.60 °C 7.00–12.4
Precipitation57.0 mm/mo 47.8–101
Air humidity56.7 % 54.8–60.6
Moisture balance-71.5 mm/mo -105–-23.8
Vapour deficit695 Pa 580–827
Wind speed3.70 m/s 3.00–4.30
Cloud cover26.3 % 21.3–40.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 115 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
