Phlomis fruticosa, la Sauge de Jérusalem, est une espèce de plantes à fleurs de la famille des Lamiaceae, originaire d'Albanie, Chypre, Grèce, Italie, Turquie, et d'autres régions de l'ancienne Yougoslavie.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Phlomis fruticosa across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Phlomis fruticosa has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens14
Marker genes6
eDNA detections8
Countries3
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL★rbcLa★ITS★ITS1★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualPhlomis fruticosa carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ita-fl — GRAMUGLIO G., ARENA M. - 1967 (1964-65). Contributo alla cariologia del genere Phlomis.. Delpinoa , 6/7/2000: 185-190.
CCDB · ita-fl — FERRARELLA A., RAIMONDO F.M., TRAPANI S. - 1978. Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana:447-456.. Inform. Bot. Ital. , 10(1): 129-140.
CCDB · ita-fl — BARTOLO G., BRULLO S., GRILLO M., PAVONE P., ZIZZA A. - 1978. Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana:382-397.. Inform. Bot. Ital. , 10(1): 64-80.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Astanova, S. B. 1984. Chromosome numbers in the species of the families Alliaceae, Asteraceae, Caryophyllaceae, Ebenaceae, Linaceae, Oleaceae, Lamiaceae from Tadjikistan. Bot. Zhurn. SSSR 69(11): 1563–1564.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Bartolo, G., S. Brullo & P. PAVONE. 1978. Numeri cromosomici per la flora Italiana: 484-493. Inform. Bot. Ital. 10: 267–277.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Ferrarella, A., F. M. Raimondo & S. TRAPANI. 1978. Numeri cromosomici per la flora Italiana: 447-456. Inform. Bot. Ital. 10: 129–140.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy86% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 443≤1 km 404≤10 km 379>10 km 68
3 294 georeferenced · 1 100 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 394
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy71% within 1 km
≤100 m 15≤1 km 19≤10 km 12>10 km 2
48 georeferenced · 198 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence246
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km
≤1 km 2≤10 km 2
4 georeferenced · 7 without coordinates
Open the mapnot free-living11
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions30 of 51 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
LDlocation not on record
52
Berlin, DE
49
BIO-UNIPIlocation not on record
23
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
11
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
7
BDBClocation not on record
6
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
6
Wlocation not on record
6
València, ES
5
Auckland, NZ
5
Stockholm, SE
4
GZUlocation not on record
4
Canberra, AU
3
GJOlocation not on record
3
Christchurch, NZ
3
Sevilla, ES
3
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
3
Adelaide, AU
2
Frankfurt am Main
2
BClocation not on record
2
Davis, US
2
PRClocation not on record
2
Barcelona, ES
2
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
2
Mexico City, MX
2
MAlocation not on record
2
CICYTEXlocation not on record
2
Yangling, CN
1
Santa Barbara, US
1
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Karlsruhe (State Museum of Natural History)location not on record
1
Vitoria, ES
1
Long Beach, US
1
Bronx, US
1
Parkville, AU
1
Denver, US
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Riverside, US
1
Dresden, DE
1
Córdoba, AR
1
UIBlocation not on record
1
Phoenix, US
1
BSBIlocation not on record
1
San Luis Obispo, US
1
Government College University Lahore, Dr. Sultan Ahmad Herbariumlocation not on record
1
National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinarian Research, Portugallocation not on record
1
Northridge, US
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
South Kensington, GB
1
EL PASO, US
1
Bloomington, US
1
Uppsala, SE
1
51 institutions · 237 of 246 vouchered records shown · 6 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA8 detections
Where the DNA of Phlomis fruticosa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found8
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 8 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.4 °C 13.8–18.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter15.3 °C
Max temp (day)20.5 °C 19.8–21.5
Min temp (night)10.4 °C 7.50–14.5
Precipitation56.3 mm/mo 19.2–70.4
Air humidity57.7 % 52.0–60.6
Moisture balance-28.0 mm/mo
Vapour deficit804 Pa 776–836
Wind speed2.90 m/s
Cloud cover39.5 % 33.8–41.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility4 667 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI8 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics14 specimens↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
Paleobiology DatabasePBDB consortiumfossil record↗