A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Phaeophyscia endophoenicea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences4
eDNA detections3
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS4
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 784 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 190
Museum / vouchered588
Other6
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 636 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy39% within 1 km
≤100 m 321≤1 km 124≤10 km 695
1 140 georeferenced · 50 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 190
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy40% within 1 km
≤100 m 72≤1 km 50≤10 km 180>10 km 6
308 georeferenced · 280 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence588
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions18 of 45 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
GZUlocation not on record
102
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
70
Uppsala, SE
59
CJBGlocation not on record
49
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
34
TSBlocation not on record
32
Olocation not on record
30
ULBF-AGRlocation not on record
24
LDlocation not on record
17
University of Gdansklocation not on record
17
Göteborg, SE
16
Bergen, NO
9
Madison, US
8
Frauenfeld, CH
7
Helsinki, FI
6
Stockholm, SE
5
Philadelphia, US
5
PRClocation not on record
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
GJOlocation not on record
3
Berlin, DE
3
Trondheim, NO
3
MeiseBGlocation not on record
2
BioFokuslocation not on record
2
Tilburg, NL
2
Vitoria, ES
2
Edinburgh, GB
2
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
2
nbflocation not on record
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
1
BClocation not on record
1
Salzburg, AT
1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
1
Dhaka, BD
1
Metsähallituslocation not on record
1
Staatsarchiv Urilocation not on record
1
ASUlocation not on record
1
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
1
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
1
St. Paul, US
1
M-Lichenslocation not on record
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Barcelona, ES
1
Chicago, US
1
45 institutions · 536 of 588 vouchered records shown · 52 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Phaeophyscia endophoenicea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.