A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Peltigera britannica has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens23
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections23
Countries4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Peltigera britannica isolate P1066 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS9
fungal barcode
07Deep time~0.78 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin0.78 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 251 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 281
Museum / vouchered966
Other4
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 832 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy86% within 1 km
≤100 m 829≤1 km 163≤10 km 149>10 km 12
1 153 georeferenced · 128 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 281
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km
≤100 m 190≤1 km 345≤10 km 82>10 km 20
637 georeferenced · 329 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence966
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions31 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Vancouver, CA
167
Olocation not on record
145
Bergen, NO
99
Trondheim, NO
75
Edmonton, CA
75
Madison, US
54
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
52
WTUlocation not on record
51
Durham, US
32
ILLSlocation not on record
26
TROMlocation not on record
17
Arcata, US
14
Victoria, CA
14
Chicago, US
11
Boise, US
11
Madrid, ES
10
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
9
ASUlocation not on record
6
Bronx, US
6
6
València, ES
4
nbflocation not on record
4
Université Lavallocation not on record
3
St. Paul, US
3
Berlin, DE
3
LDlocation not on record
3
Uppsala, SE
3
Barcelona, ES
3
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
3
Clocation not on record
3
Philadelphia, US
2
University of Gdansklocation not on record
2
DOI/FWS, Kenai National Wildlife Refugelocation not on record
2
BioFokuslocation not on record
2
Portland, US
2
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
2
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
2
US
2
Stockholm, SE
2
MAlocation not on record
2
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
2
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
AADClocation not on record
1
DClocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Henderson, US
1
Santa Barbara, US
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
San Sebastián, ES
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Officelocation not on record
1
University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Kenai National Wildlife Refugelocation not on record
1
EL PASO, US
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
58 institutions · 951 of 966 vouchered records shown · 15 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA23 detections
Where the DNA of Peltigera britannica was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found23
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 23 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
black spruce forestzonal CWH forest
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.2 °C 12.4–14.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.4 °C
Max temp (day)16.2 °C 15.0–16.6
Min temp (night)10.1 °C 9.70–10.5
Precipitation93.2 mm/mo 83.7–145
Air humidity64.5 % 62.3–65.9
Moisture balance16.9 mm/mo -30.0–38.1
Vapour deficit579 Pa 502–581
Wind speed4.50 m/s 3.10–6.10
Cloud cover48.5 % 40.7–50.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.