Pedicularis sudetica, common names of which are fernweed, Sudeten lousewort, Sedetic lousewort, and Sudetic lousewort is a species of flowering plant in the family Orobanchaceae which is native to Poland, the former Czechoslovakia, and northern Russia to the Urals, but can now be found in such US states as Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Canada since it was introduced there. The plant is both perennial and bisexual. It grows high with the flowers being hermaphrodite.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Pedicularis sudetica has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens28
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections12
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcLa★ITS10★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualPedicularis sudetica carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — ZHUKOVA, P. G. 1982. Chromosome numbers of some plant species of north-eastern Asia. Bot. Zhurn. SSSR 67 (3): 360–365.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Krogulevich, R. E. 1976. Rol poliploidii v genesise flory Putorana. In: L. I. Malyshev, ed. 1976 Flora Putorana: Materali k Poznaniiu Osobennostei Sostava i Genezisia Gornykh Subarkticheskikh Flor Sibir. Novosibirsk. Nauka, Novosibirsk
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — ZHUKOVA, P. G. & V. V. Petrovsky. 1980. Chromosome numbers and taxonomy of some species of the Anyui Mts. Bot. Zhurn. 65 (5): 651–659.
CCDB · book-ipcn66 — Mosquin& Hayley 1966
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — HEDBERG, o. 1967. Chromosome numbers of vascular plants from arctic and subarctic North America. Ark. f. Bot. Ser. 2. 6: 309-326.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — ZHUKOVA, P.G . & A.D. TIKHONOVA. 1971. Chromosome numbers of certain plant species indigenous to the Chukotsky province. (In Russian). Bot. Zurn. 56: 868-875.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — ZHUKOVA, P.G., & V.V. PETROVSKY. 1971. Chromosome numbers of certain flowering plants of the Wrangel island. (In Russian). Bot. Zurn. 56: 294-305.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — CARR, G.D. 1971. In IOPB chromosome number reports XXXI. Taxon 20: 157-160.
CCDB · book-ipcn75-78 — Zhukova et al. 1977a
CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 — ZHUKOVA, P.G., V.V. PETROVSKY, & T.N. PLIEVA. 1973. The chromosome numbers and taxonomy of some plant species from Siberia and Far East. (in Russian) Bot. zurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 58: 1331-1342.
CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 — PACKER, J. G., & G.D. MCPHERSON. 1974. Chromosome numbers in some vascular plants from northern Alaska. Canad. J. Bot. 52: 1095-1099.
CCDB · book-fedorov — Wiens, Halleck 1962
CCDB · book-fedorov — CoxonoucKaH 1960a
CCDB · book-fedorov — CoxonoucKaH, CTpenxoua 1960
CCDB · book-fedorov — Packer 1964
CCDB · book-fedorov — Mosquin, Hayley 1966
n 81×CCDB · Cave1962
CCDB · Cave1962 — Wiens & H. 1962
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km
≤100 m 185≤1 km 62≤10 km 163>10 km 80
490 georeferenced · 117 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor607
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy28% within 1 km
≤100 m 18≤1 km 59≤10 km 96>10 km 102
275 georeferenced · 538 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence813
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions37 of 66 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
199
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
131
Victoria, CA
65
WTUlocation not on record
32
Toronto, CA
27
Vancouver, CA
24
Yukon Universitylocation not on record
24
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
24
Denver, US
15
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
15
BRNUlocation not on record
13
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
12
WINlocation not on record
12
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
11
Wuzhou, CN
8
LDlocation not on record
8
GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record
7
Anchorage, US
7
University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record
7
Research Collection of B. A. Bennettlocation not on record
5
Canadian Museum of Naturelocation not on record
3
Tempe, US
3
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
3
Dresden, DE
3
SNSNMClocation not on record
3
Oskarshamn, SE
3
Flagstaff, US
3
Uniwersytet Opolskilocation not on record
3
Beijing, CN
2
Cambridge, US
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Albuquerque, US
2
Kew, GB
2
Montréal, CA
2
West Virginia Wesleyan Collegelocation not on record
2
IWEP FEB RASlocation not on record
2
BClocation not on record
2
Moscow, US
1
Bourges, FR
1
US
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
1
Williamsburg, US
1
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
1
Orem, US
1
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Guilin, CN
1
Davis, US
1
San Angelo, US
1
Chadron, US
1
Québec, CA
1
Fargo, US
1
GB
1
Trondheim, NO
1
University of Lethbridgelocation not on record
1
Uppsala, SE
1
Whitehorse, CA
1
Chicago, US
1
Boise, US
1
Institute of the biological problems of the North FEB RASlocation not on record
1
PRClocation not on record
1
Bronx, US
1
Madison, US
1
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
1
Pullman, US
1
66 institutions · 717 of 813 vouchered records shown · 96 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA12 detections
Where the DNA of Pedicularis sudetica was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found12
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 12 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
snowbank and lake flooding zoneRich meadows at late snowmelt site. Wet grow…Subhygric Herb -Cushion shrubHygric Fen dominated by Carex aquatilis var.…Coastal Shrub-Sedge Fen
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median7.70 °C 6.70–10.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter36.3 °C
Max temp (day)11.7 °C 10.4–14.8
Min temp (night)4.80 °C 3.30–7.00
Precipitation81.8 mm/mo 60.0–133
Air humidity63.7 % 61.5–65.3
Moisture balance4.60 mm/mo -37.3–48.1
Vapour deficit379 Pa 348–485
Wind speed4.40 m/s 3.20–5.10
Cloud cover71.7 % 47.6–73.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 9 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.