Omoglymmius hamatus

(LeConte, 1875) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Carabidae/Omoglymmius

At a glance

Occurrence records217

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens2

eDNA detections6

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Omoglymmius hamatus's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility217 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics2 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF217 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries6 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD2 specimens

01Narrative

Omoglymmius hamatus is a species of beetle in the family Rhysodidae. It was described by John Lawrence LeConte in 1875. Its common name is the wrinkled bark beetle, though this name can refer to the entire family.Evans, A. V. and J. N. Hogue. (2006). Field Guide to Beetles of California. University of California Press. This beetle can be found in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California in the United States. It makes its home in fallen logs in mountainous areas. The adult is between 6 and 7 millimeters long.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding2 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Omoglymmius hamatus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens2

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections6

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type217 records

Wild obs. + sensor10

Museum / vouchered207

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO228 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy89% within 1 km

≤100 m 3≤1 km 5>10 km 1

9 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor10

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy41% within 1 km

≤1 km 7≤10 km 6>10 km 4

17 georeferenced · 190 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence207

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions6 of 9 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
OSUClocation not on record	101
San Francisco, US	51
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	34
Provo, US	8
Edmonton, CA	5
Chicago, US	2
EWIClocation not on record	1
Honolulu, US	1
Champaign, US	1

9 institutions · 204 of 207 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA6 detections

Where the DNA of Omoglymmius hamatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found6

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 6 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median4.90 °C 4.90–4.90

Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.4 °C

Max temp (day)11.3 °C

Min temp (night)-0.9 °C

Precipitation131 mm/mo

Air humidity52.5 %

Moisture balance47.7 mm/mo

Vapour deficit480 Pa

Wind speed1.60 m/s

Cloud cover37.0 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)