Compounds documented for Ochrolechia tartarea across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile1 class
Pyrroloquinoline alkaloids1
Documented compounds3 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
ARYKGGHKIXVLJL-SDSRNJDFSA-O
present
NPASS
QYJUINXANIOBKV-XYVASLDOSA-O
present
NPASS
05DNA & barcoding6 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ochrolechia tartarea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections6
Countries4
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Ochrolechia tartarea voucher O-L-196041 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type4 240 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 011
Museum / vouchered1 213
Other16
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO10 620 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy62% within 1 km
≤100 m 854≤1 km 979≤10 km 1 127>10 km 7
2 967 georeferenced · 44 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 011
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy29% within 1 km
≤100 m 73≤1 km 138≤10 km 354>10 km 152
717 georeferenced · 496 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 213
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions45 of 87 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
193
Uppsala, SE
180
LDlocation not on record
125
Chicago, US
59
WTUlocation not on record
49
Trondheim, NO
47
Bergen, NO
47
Berlin, DE
42
Madison, US
41
Durham, US
30
TROMlocation not on record
27
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
25
ASUlocation not on record
24
New Haven, US
17
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
14
11
Université Lavallocation not on record
10
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
9
València, ES
9
PHlocation not on record
9
Stockholm, SE
8
TSBlocation not on record
8
Kew, GB
8
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
8
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
7
Edmonton, CA
7
MAlocation not on record
7
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
7
Clocation not on record
6
Oskarshamn, SE
6
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
6
Helsinki, FI
6
Vitoria, ES
5
University of Gdansklocation not on record
5
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
5
Madrid, ES
5
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
5
Philadelphia, US
4
nbflocation not on record
4
MeiseBGlocation not on record
4
US
4
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
3
ILLSlocation not on record
3
Bronx, US
3
Göteborg, SE
3
Knoxville, US
3
Ann Arbor, US
3
Garðabær, IS
2
Minia, EG
2
Salzburg, AT
2
St. Paul, US
2
BClocation not on record
2
CJBGlocation not on record
2
Vancouver, CA
2
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
Turku, FI
1
Oulu, FI
1
San Sebastián, ES
1
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
1
Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia Giancarlo Ligabue | Natural History Museum of Venice Giancarlo Ligabuelocation not on record
1
AASlocation not on record
1
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
San Luis Obispo, US
1
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
New Brunswick, US
1
British Antarctic Surveylocation not on record
1
Staten Island, US
1
Logan, US
1
South Kensington, GB
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
1
CLUlocation not on record
1
Tilburg, NL
1
Porvoo, FI
1
Hobart, AU
1
Mlocation not on record
1
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburghlocation not on record
1
M-Lichenslocation not on record
1
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
1
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
1
Bando, JP
1
Boise, US
1
Metsähallituslocation not on record
1
Kuopio, FI
1
Bozeman, US
1
87 institutions · 1 160 of 1 213 vouchered records shown · 50 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Ochrolechia tartarea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
trunk of birch, southern end of Loch MareeSloping rock face in maritime heath
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.9 °C 10.1–12.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter11.4 °C
Max temp (day)12.6 °C 11.4–14.3
Min temp (night)7.90 °C 7.70–10.8
Precipitation96.7 mm/mo 82.2–139
Air humidity65.9 % 63.7–71.1
Moisture balance43.9 mm/mo
Vapour deficit436 Pa 385–524
Wind speed5.40 m/s
Cloud cover55.3 % 50.7–64.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.