Nomada ruficornis is a Palearctic species of nomad bee.BWARSEdward Saunders 1896, The Hymenoptera Aculeata of the British Isles London. pdf us.archive Full text with illustrations]
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Nomada ruficornis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens61
BINs2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections50
Countries11
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus52 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 99% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 8 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.53%
Haplotypes5
BINs2
Most divergent pair4.6%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualNomada ruficornis carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈273 010 833 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Nomada ruficornis0.27 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness97.2% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type8 655 records
Wild obs. + sensor4 533
Museum / vouchered4 096
Cultivated / captive1
Other25
Origin
Native854
Introduced1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO14 100 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 795≤1 km 856≤10 km 1 804>10 km 1
4 456 georeferenced · 77 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 533
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy29% within 1 km
≤100 m 497≤1 km 623≤10 km 2 632>10 km 54
3 806 georeferenced · 290 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence4 096
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 60 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
406
Helsinki, FI
392
ULglocation not on record
354
Mons, BE
292
Zürich, CH
227
Bern, CH
188
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
172
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
159
Natuurpuntlocation not on record
150
NMOKlocation not on record
108
Philadelphia, US
103
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
75
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
64
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
63
Paro, BT
61
NCMGlocation not on record
44
Tilburg, NL
41
CBDClocation not on record
40
Trondheim, NO
35
South Kensington, GB
29
Stockholm, SE
28
NHMOlocation not on record
27
PRAZlocation not on record
26
Geneva, CH
26
Bonn, DE
23
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
23
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
22
Wuzhou, CN
21
neflocation not on record
17
Ghent, BE
14
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
14
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
13
PRUNlocation not on record
13
Frauenfeld, CH
12
ZSMlocation not on record
11
Ugentlocation not on record
11
MZLUlocation not on record
11
ZMAAlocation not on record
10
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
9
Gothenburg, SE
9
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
8
MNHWlocation not on record
5
BioFokuslocation not on record
5
SGAV-and-NHMDlocation not on record
5
AGClocation not on record
4
US
3
Winterthur, CH
2
LDSVlocation not on record
2
Sion, CH
2
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
2
Fribourg, CH
2
Metsähallituslocation not on record
1
Dhaka, BD
1
Tartu, EE
1
Tromsø, NO
1
Philadelphia, US
1
USALlocation not on record
1
PUKlocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
1
DFlocation not on record
1
60 institutions · 3 392 of 4 096 vouchered records shown · 704 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA50 detections
Where the DNA of Nomada ruficornis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found50
Studies independent surveys3
Countries11
Verifiable raw sequence linked2
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 50 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
Chenaie
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.6 °C 6.80–12.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.6 °C
Max temp (day)13.7 °C 9.40–16.1
Min temp (night)5.90 °C 2.50–8.20
Precipitation76.8 mm/mo 37.5–103
Air humidity60.2 % 56.4–63.4
Moisture balance-21.9 mm/mo -58.3–1.50
Vapour deficit497 Pa 386–602
Wind speed3.20 m/s 2.00–4.70
Cloud cover41.7 % 35.8–47.1
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 46 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.