Compounds documented for Nephroma arcticum across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Nephroma arcticum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens44
Marker genes1
eDNA detections44
Countries3
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
07Deep time~39.1 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin39.1 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type14 930 records
Wild obs. + sensor11 534
Museum / vouchered3 395
Cultivated / captive1
Origin
Introduced1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO31 912 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 5 285≤1 km 1 334≤10 km 4 463>10 km 66
11 148 georeferenced · 386 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor11 534
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km
≤100 m 224≤1 km 532≤10 km 532>10 km 324
1 612 georeferenced · 1 783 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence3 395
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
≤10 km 1
1 georeferenced
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions55 of 103 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
503
Uppsala, SE
359
Madison, US
296
LDlocation not on record
191
Université Lavallocation not on record
166
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
149
TROMlocation not on record
144
Vancouver, CA
142
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
111
Durham, US
98
Bergen, NO
85
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
79
Trondheim, NO
70
Stockholm, SE
59
ASUlocation not on record
59
Philadelphia, US
50
Edmonton, CA
38
Chicago, US
33
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
33
WTUlocation not on record
33
Ann Arbor, US
33
St. Paul, US
30
Berlin, DE
28
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
26
Helsinki, FI
25
BRNUlocation not on record
22
20
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
20
US
19
Bronx, US
18
Clocation not on record
17
PHlocation not on record
15
Göteborg, SE
14
Bando, JP
13
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
13
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
13
Boise, US
12
Oskarshamn, SE
10
Knoxville, US
9
University of Gdansklocation not on record
9
Repubblica di San Marinolocation not on record
8
New Haven, US
8
Champaign, US
7
University of Manitobalocation not on record
6
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
6
Toronto, CA
6
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
6
Wuzhou, CN
6
Chapel Hill, US
6
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
6
Santa Barbara, US
5
MeiseBGlocation not on record
5
Turku, FI
5
nbflocation not on record
5
Minia, EG
5
Mlocation not on record
4
Burlington, US
4
ILLSlocation not on record
4
Victoria, CA
4
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
4
University of Western Ontariolocation not on record
4
AADClocation not on record
4
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
4
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
3
Bozeman, US
3
Lincoln, US
3
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
3
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
3
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
3
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
3
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
2
Portland, US
2
BioFokuslocation not on record
2
Yugra State University Biological Collectionlocation not on record
2
Servico de Microbiologia e Imunologialocation not on record
2
New Brunswick, US
2
Yukon Universitylocation not on record
2
Oulu, FI
2
Madrid, ES
2
Tallinn, EE
2
Garðabær, IS
2
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botanylocation not on record
2
DOI/FWS, Kenai National Wildlife Refugelocation not on record
2
Oregon State Universitylocation not on record
1
PRClocation not on record
1
Davis, US
1
Logan, US
1
Albuquerque, US
1
Kenai National Wildlife Refugelocation not on record
1
Pocatello, US
1
Kuopio, FI
1
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
1
Vitoria, ES
1
Baltimore, US
1
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
1
Porvoo, FI
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Salzburg, AT
1
San Diego, US
1
EL PASO, US
1
Forssa, FI
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
103 institutions · 3 253 of 3 395 vouchered records shown · 139 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA44 detections
Where the DNA of Nephroma arcticum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found44
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 44 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
Mossy rock wall by riveron rockblack spruce & aspen foreston sheltered parts or in fissures of the rockOn the ground in slope in the low alpine reg…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median9.20 °C 2.50–13.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.7 °C
Max temp (day)11.6 °C 5.20–15.9
Min temp (night)6.10 °C -0.7–9.30
Precipitation84.5 mm/mo 61.0–143
Air humidity65.4 % 61.3–68.8
Moisture balance40.7 mm/mo
Vapour deficit416 Pa 330–566
Wind speed3.90 m/s
Cloud cover52.5 % 45.5–63.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 13 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.