Myriophyllum heterophyllum (English: twoleaf watermilfoil or broadleaf watermilfoil) is a species from the genus Myriophyllum. It was first described by André Michaux.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Myriophyllum heterophyllum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens30
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections27
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK4★rbcL3★rbcLa★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~0.63 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin0.63 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type4 460 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 562
Museum / vouchered1 163
Other1 735
Origin
Native38
Introduced13
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO7 268 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy43% within 1 km
≤100 m 473≤1 km 149≤10 km 801>10 km 28
1 451 georeferenced · 111 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 562
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy40% within 1 km
≤100 m 77≤1 km 174≤10 km 290>10 km 79
620 georeferenced · 543 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 163
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions76 of 122 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Chicago, US
100
Ann Arbor, US
65
Saint John, CA
48
Madison, US
43
Philadelphia, US
42
Austin, US
35
Saint Louis, US
34
Chapel Hill, US
22
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
21
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
20
Wuzhou, CN
20
Bloomington, US
18
Columbia, US
17
BAYLUlocation not on record
16
MeiseBGlocation not on record
16
PRClocation not on record
15
Durham, US
15
Green Bay, US
15
Philadelphia, US
14
Tuscaloosa, US
13
Fort Worth, US
12
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
12
Görlitz, DE
11
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record
10
Whitewater, US
10
Brussel, BE
10
Williamsburg, US
10
Toronto, CA
9
Université Lavallocation not on record
9
Victoria, CA
9
WTUlocation not on record
8
New Haven, US
8
Miami, US
7
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
7
Tampa, US
7
Durango, MX
6
GJOlocation not on record
5
Jackson, US
5
Fayetteville, US
5
GAlocation not on record
5
Norfolk, US
5
Lubbock, US
5
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
4
Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record
4
Pittsburg, US
4
US
4
San Angelo, US
4
Davenport, US
3
Québec, CA
3
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
3
University of Wisconsinlocation not on record
3
Vancouver, CA
3
Bangkok, TH
3
Edmonton, CA
3
Phoenix, US
3
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
3
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
3
Little Rock, US
3
Davis, US
2
Keene State Universitylocation not on record
2
Denton, US
2
EL PASO, US
2
Mexico City, MX
2
Dekalb, US
2
Minia, EG
2
MAlocation not on record
2
Millersville, US
2
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
2
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
Knoxville, US
2
Tilburg, NL
2
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
2
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
2
València, ES
2
University of Guelph, OAC Herbariumlocation not on record
2
Flagstaff, US
2
Vitoria, ES
2
Nijmegen, NL
2
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
1
Burlington, US
1
Frankfurt am Main
1
Clemson, US
1
Bronx, US
1
CASlocation not on record
1
H-Hohlalocation not on record
1
BClocation not on record
1
Kunming, CN
1
LINUlocation not on record
1
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
1
University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
San Francisco, US
1
Naturalis Biodiversity Centerlocation not on record
1
University of North Carolina at Pembrokelocation not on record
1
Lincoln, US
1
Royal Botanical Gardenslocation not on record
1
Stephenville, US
1
Universidad del Pais Vasco (UPV/EHU)location not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
1
Salamanca, ES
1
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
Santa Barbara, US
1
ASUlocation not on record
1
Weymouth Woods Sandhills Nature Preservelocation not on record
1
Trois-Rivières, CA
1
Chadron, US
1
Riverside, US
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
Whitehorse, CA
1
Oswego, US
1
Audubon Society -- Silver Bluff Audubon Center and Sanctuarylocation not on record
1
GB
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Oskarshamn, SE
1
San Sebastián, ES
1
Morgantown, US
1
Springfield, US
1
Cheney, US
1
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
1
122 institutions · 902 of 1 163 vouchered records shown · 243 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA27 detections
Where the DNA of Myriophyllum heterophyllum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found27
Studies independent surveys1
Countries5
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 27 detections have coordinates
Open the map5 countries0
Abundant in shallow water
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.7 °C 15.2–19.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter15.0 °C
Max temp (day)19.7 °C 19.3–24.1
Min temp (night)11.2 °C 10.7–14.7
Precipitation71.7 mm/mo 71.7–83.7
Air humidity60.4 % 57.1–60.4
Moisture balance-50.5 mm/mo -61.4–-15.9
Vapour deficit708 Pa 691–977
Wind speed4.50 m/s 2.60–4.50
Cloud cover36.5 % 34.4–50.1
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 24 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.