Morchella dunensis, the morel of the dunes, is a species of fungus in the family Morchellaceae (Ascomycota). It was first described as a form of Morchella esculenta by Castañera and colleagues in 1996,Castañera V, Moreno G. (1996). Una Morchella (Morchella esculenta forma dunensis f. nov.) frecuente en las dunas de Cantabria. Yesca, Rev Soc Micólogica de Cántabria 8:27. but was later recombined as a distinct species by Clowez.Clowez P. (1997). Morchella dunensis (Boud.) Clowez (stat. et comb. nov. ad int.). Une bonne espèce pour un mystère nomenclatural. Documents Mycologiques 26(104):13–20. In a 2014 study by Richard and colleagues, the authors concluded that the taxon was conspecific to Morchella vulgaris, due to its close phylogenetic proximity to the latter. However, following increased molecular sampling and the testing of an isoparatype collection by Loizides and colleagues in 2016, it was revealed that M. dunensis is indeed very closely related to, but phylogenetically distinct from M. vulgaris. This study also showed that the taxon Morchella andalusiae is phylogenetically identical and therefore a later synonym of M. dunensis. Morchella dunensis is notable for its xerophilic, Mediterranean ecology and distribution, often found on coastal dunes and bare, well-drained soil.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Morchella esculenta across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
🍽 Used in cooking
Compound class profile5 classes
Aminoacids23
Cholestane steroids $ Ergostane steroids3
Triacylglycerols2
Farnesane sesquiterpenoids $ Hydrocarbons2
Aminoacids $ Dipeptides1
Documented compounds54 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
(+)-Valine
present
LOTUS
(-)-Cystine
present
LOTUS
(2R)-2-azaniumyl-3-phenylpropanoate
present
LOTUS
(2S)-2-(phenylazaniumyl)propanoate
present
LOTUS
(2S)-2-ammonio-3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propanoate
present
LOTUS
(2S)-2-ammonio-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoate
present
LOTUS
(2S,3R)-3-aminopyrrolidin-1-ium-2-carboxylate
present
LOTUS
(2S,3S)-2-ammonio-3-methylpentanoate
present
LOTUS
(6E,10E)-2,6,10-trimethyldodeca-2,6,10-triene
present
NPASS
(6E,10Z)-2,6,10-trimethyldodeca-2,6,10-triene
present
NPASS
05DNA & barcoding38 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Morchella esculenta has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens38
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections52
Countries9
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT
The complete instruction manualMorchella esculenta carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size48 210 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
THIS GENOME Morchella esculenta0.05 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type8 788 records
Wild obs. + sensor7 715
Museum / vouchered938
Cultivated / captive1
Other134
Origin
Native9
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO17 796 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy42% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 707≤1 km 1 050≤10 km 3 576>10 km 223
6 556 georeferenced · 1 159 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor7 715
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy62% within 1 km
≤100 m 92≤1 km 150≤10 km 130>10 km 19
391 georeferenced · 547 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence938
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions42 of 77 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Copenhagen, DK
92
Ann Arbor, US
65
Tartu, EE
53
Olocation not on record
51
Helsinki, FI
39
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
35
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
30
Karlsruhe, DE
27
Chicago, US
25
Görlitz, DE
23
San Sebastián, ES
22
Mexico City, MX
21
Kew, GB
19
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
18
BDBClocation not on record
17
Auckland, NZ
17
WU-MYClocation not on record
17
Vitoria, ES
16
Berlin, DE
15
Bando, JP
14
LDlocation not on record
14
Odawara, JP
14
GJOlocation not on record
14
Uppsala, SE
12
Philadelphia, US
9
Staten Island, US
9
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
9
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
9
Mexico City, MX
8
Bronx, US
8
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
8
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
7
Göteborg, SE
6
Toronto, CA
5
WTUlocation not on record
5
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
4
Zürich, CH
4
Durango, MX
4
Department of Plant Resources, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratorieslocation not on record
3
Tlalnepantla, MX
3
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
3
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
3
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
3
Osaka, JP
3
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
3
St. Paul, US
2
Nunoa, Santiago, CL
2
Joensuu, FI
2
Slovenian Forestry Institutelocation not on record
2
Mlocation not on record
2
Brisbane, AU
2
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
2
Zapopan, MX
2
Oskarshamn, SE
2
MAlocation not on record
2
BRNUlocation not on record
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Bardejov, SK
2
Salzburg, AT
2
Kuopio, FI
1
Musée des Confluenceslocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
1
Tilburg, NL
1
Mexico City, MX
1
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
1
UFSMlocation not on record
1
Kensington, AU
1
Turku, FI
1
DIEF VALONSADEROlocation not on record
1
International Salmonella Centre (W.H.O.)location not on record
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
nsnflocation not on record
1
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
1
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
1
Otaru, JP
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Fungario QCAM de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadorlocation not on record
1
77 institutions · 832 of 938 vouchered records shown · 99 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA52 detections
Where the DNA of Morchella esculenta was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found52
Studies independent surveys3
Countries9
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 52 detections have coordinates
Open the map9 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
pH8.70 7.90–8.80
Conductivity106 µS/cm 62.0–118
Organic carbon0.16 % 0.09–1.25
Water content5.09 % 4.47–10.0
Nitrate-N3.00 mg/kg 3.00–6.00
Phosphorus11.0 mg/kg 6.00–78.0
Clay2.42 % 1.92–2.92
Sand97.6 % 97.1–98.1
Depth0.2 m 0–0.2
SoilLatLon out of rangeVertosol
3 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median11.3 °C 8.30–16.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.7 °C
Max temp (day)15.1 °C 11.9–22.4
Min temp (night)7.30 °C 4.60–14.2
Precipitation58.1 mm/mo 42.6–79.6
Air humidity59.4 % 51.6–64.0
Moisture balance-26.0 mm/mo -90.1–-4.10
Vapour deficit552 Pa 449–1,017
Wind speed3.70 m/s 2.60–5.10
Cloud cover41.8 % 21.0–42.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 21 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.