Monilinia laxa

(Aderh. & Ruhland) Honey · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Ascomycota/Leotiomycetes/Helotiales/Sclerotiniaceae/Monilinia

At a glance

Occurrence records533

Data sources10

Biological traits0

DNA specimens76

eDNA detections46

Sources10 archives

Databases and archives Monilinia laxa's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation7 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility533 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI46 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics76 specimens↗

NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF533 records

Environmental DNA2 datasets · 6 countries46 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD · NCBI76 specimens

Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI≈43 Mbp

01Narrative

Monilinia laxa is a plant pathogen that is the causal agent of brown rot of stone fruits.Brown rot of stone fruits, Monilinia fructicola and Monilinia laxa at State of Victoria Typical Monilinia laxa infection of apple fruit

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding76 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Monilinia laxa has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens76

Marker genes2

GenBank sequences10

eDNA detections46

Countries11

The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species

ITSPZ364642.1 ↗507 bpTurkey · 2021

ACGT

TCATTACAGAGTTCATGCCCGAAAGGGTAGACCTCCCACCCTTGTGTATTATTACTTTGTTGCTTTGGCGAGCTGCCTTCGGGCCTTGTA …

Monilinia laxa isolate M25 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★ITS10★ITS1

fungal barcode

06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI

The complete instruction manual Monilinia laxa carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.

Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is

Genome size≈42 814 844 bp assembly estimate

Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).

BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb

FUNGUS0.04 Gb

THIS GENOME Monilinia laxa0.04 Gb

INSECT0.25 Gb

HUMAN3.2 Gb

WHEAT17 Gb

FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb

Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers

Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.

Assembly levelScaffold

Completeness97.4% BUSCO

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type533 records

Wild obs. + sensor274

Museum / vouchered229

Cultivated / captive16

Other14

Origin

Native1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO1 464 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy77% within 1 km

≤100 m 178≤1 km 28≤10 km 58>10 km 3

267 georeferenced · 7 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor274

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy79% within 1 km

≤100 m 7≤1 km 78≤10 km 13>10 km 10

108 georeferenced · 121 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence229

Cultivated / Captivenot free-living

A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 16 records without

Open the mapnot free-living16

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions7 of 14 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Olocation not on record	81
Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistanlocation not on record	73
Auckland, NZ	18
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record	11
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record	8
Tartu, EE	3
Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistanlocation not on record	2
Toronto, CA	2
Kew, GB	1
Görlitz, DE	1
Karlsruhe, DE	1
Helsinki, FI	1
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record	1
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	1

14 institutions · 204 of 229 vouchered records shown · 15 without an institution code

Cultivated / Captivenot free-living

A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.

09Environmental DNA46 detections

Where the DNA of Monilinia laxa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found46

Studies independent surveys2

Countries6

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 46 detections have coordinates

Open the map6 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median13.8 °C 7.80–15.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.1 °C

Max temp (day)18.8 °C 10.1–20.1

Min temp (night)8.40 °C 3.40–9.00

Precipitation58.3 mm/mo 33.4–318

Air humidity57.1 % 52.9–64.7

Moisture balance-48.1 mm/mo -61.7–236

Vapour deficit755 Pa 440–953

Wind speed2.80 m/s 2.00–5.70

Cloud cover38.3 % 36.7–44.3

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 12 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)