Compounds documented for Microgramma nitida across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile1 class
Stigmastane steroids1
Documented compounds1 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
beta-Sitosterol
present
LOTUS
05DNA & barcoding2 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Microgramma nitida has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences3
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcL3
plant barcode
07Deep time~7.91 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin7.91 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type547 records
Wild obs. + sensor25
Museum / vouchered512
Other10
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 232 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km
≤100 m 8≤1 km 5≤10 km 2>10 km 2
17 georeferenced · 8 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor25
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy95% within 1 km
≤100 m 219≤1 km 6≤10 km 12
237 georeferenced · 275 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence512
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions30 of 46 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
132
Saint Louis, US
104
Mexico City, MX
40
Mérida, MX
31
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
25
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record
18
Chicago, US
18
Bronx, US
17
Austin, US
16
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
10
San Francisco, US
9
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
8
South Kensington, GB
6
Austin, US
5
Mexico City, MX
5
MEXUlocation not on record
5
Tapachula, MX
5
Riverside, US
4
Juriquilla, MX
4
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
4
Guatemala City, GT
3
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record
3
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
3
Cambridge, US
3
Calabar, NG
3
Sangmiung Universitylocation not on record
2
Tampa, US
2
Facultad de Biología, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
2
León, NI
2
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
2
UFPIlocation not on record
1
Miami, US
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Universidad Nacional Agrarialocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Minister of Sustainable Development, Climate Change & Solid Waste Managementlocation not on record
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
Kew, GB
1
Chapingo, MX
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
San Luis Potosí, MX
1
Burlington, US
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
46 institutions · 507 of 512 vouchered records shown · 4 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Microgramma nitida was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.7 °C 15.7–15.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter9.60 °C
Max temp (day)22.0 °C
Min temp (night)9.00 °C
Precipitation34.7 mm/mo
Air humidity50.9 %
Moisture balance-93.3 mm/mo
Vapour deficit884 Pa
Wind speed4.10 m/s
Cloud cover25.5 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.